首页> 外文会议>Remote Sensing, Environment and Transportation Engineering (RSETE), 2012 2nd International Conference on >Study on Information Extraction Method of Land Use and Cover Based on Remote Sensing Technology
【24h】

Study on Information Extraction Method of Land Use and Cover Based on Remote Sensing Technology

机译:基于遥感技术的土地利用与覆被信息提取方法研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Land Use/Cover Change (LUCC) is one of the core research projects which belongs to the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (IGBP) and the Global Environmental Change Human Dimensions Programme (HDP), It is the world's hot spot and cutting-edge environmental research problem, the typical Land Use/Cover Change and its environmental effects of global change research is one of the important way to recognize. In this paper, as the study area in Miyun County of Beijing, Miyun County in 1996 by TM remote sensing image as data source, the area of land use information extraction. Firstly, taken a series measures of original image data preprocessing, then established the Miyun County land use classification system, using different methods to extract land use information, such as ISODATA classification method, Mahalanobis Distance classification method, Maximum Likelihood classification method, to contrast the accuracy of three classification methods, based on it, to analysis the different types of land use and land cover classification accuracy. The paper analyzes and evaluates the classification accuracy results, the overall accuracy of three classification methods are all more than 80%, satisfied the application requirements. Although the Maximum Likelihood classification method has higher classification accuracy, but accuracy of some land use and land cover classification types are relatively worse.
机译:土地利用/覆盖变化(LUCC)是国际地圈-生物圈计划(IGBP)和全球环境变化人类尺度计划(HDP)的核心研究项目之一,是世界热点和前沿环境研究问题,典型的土地利用/覆盖变化及其对全球变化研究的环境影响是认识的重要途径之一。本文以北京密云县为研究区,1996年以TM云遥感影像为数据源,对该地区的土地利用信息进行提取。首先采取一系列原始图像数据预处理措施,然后建立密云县土地利用分类系统,采用ISODATA分类法,马氏距离分类法,最大似然分类法等不同方法提取土地利用信息,以对比基于三种分类方法的准确性,可以分析不同类型的土地利用和土地覆被分类的准确性。对分类精度结果进行分析和评价,三种分类方法的总体精度均在80%以上,满足了应用要求。尽管最大似然分类法具有较高的分类精度,但某些土地利用和土地覆被分类类型的准确性相对较差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号