【24h】

A case study: the economic cost of net metering in maryland: who bears the economic burden?

机译:案例研究:马里兰州净计量的经济成本:谁承担经济负担?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The Maryland legislature approved net-metering legislation for residential consumer generators with photovoltaic systems during 1997. Before the legislation passed, the Maryland Energy Administration (MEA) examined its potential economic impact on both the affected utilities and consumer ratepayers--with and without net-metered PV systems. The MEA discovered that the impact on the affected utility is minimal when the net-metered PV capacity is limited to a small percentage of utility peak load. The analysis also determined that the cost burden on other customers under a net-metered scenario is likewise limited. For Maryland's largest investor-owned utility, the maximum amount of any cross-subsidy (or cost) on a per customer basis is 46 cents annually. Furthermore, our analysis showed that when distribution system savings and environmental externalities are incorporated, net-metered customers may actually subsidize other utility customers. The MEA analysis also determined that about 50
机译:马里兰州立法机关在1997年批准了带有光伏系统的家用消费发电机的净计量立法。在该立法通过之前,马里兰州能源管理局(MEA)审查了其对受影响的公用事业公司和消费者纳税人的潜在经济影响,无论是否使用净电,计量光伏系统。 MEA发现,当将净计量的PV容量限制在公用事业峰值负荷的一小部分时,对受影响公用事业的影响最小。分析还确定,在净计量情况下,其他客户的成本负担也受到限制。对于马里兰州最大的投资者拥有的公用事业,每位客户每年的任何交叉补贴(或成本)最高金额为46美分。此外,我们的分析表明,将节约的配电系统和环境的外部因素结合在一起,净计量用户实际上可能会补贴其他公用事业用户。 MEA分析还确定,大约50

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号