首页> 外文会议>Proceedings of the second workshop on the atmospheric chemistry validation of ENVISAT (ACVE-2) >VALIDATION OF MIPAS AND SCIAMACHY DATA BY GROUND-BASEDSPECTROSCOPY AT KIRUNA, SWEDEN, AND IZANA, TENERIFE ISLAND (AOID-191)
【24h】

VALIDATION OF MIPAS AND SCIAMACHY DATA BY GROUND-BASEDSPECTROSCOPY AT KIRUNA, SWEDEN, AND IZANA, TENERIFE ISLAND (AOID-191)

机译:瑞典基律纳和特纳里费岛伊萨纳的地面基波谱法对MIPAS和坐骨神经痛数据的验证(AOID-191)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Within this ENVISAT validation project [AOID-191]rnground-based measurements of different techniquesrnhave been performed at Kiruna in the Arctic and onrnTenerife Island in the subtropics. These ground-basedrndata were used to validate SCIAMACHY and MIPASrndata.rnUsing MIPAS 4.61 O_3 profiles on a pressure scale andrndegrading their vertical resolution to that of the FTIRrnprofiles a good agreement is demonstrated. Thernprecision of FTIR O_3 profiles is about 10 %. Therndifferences between MIPAS and FTIR are within therncombined error bar.rnMIPAS 4.61 HNO_3 profiles differ about 10 to 15 % forrnaltitudes above 15 km. The corresponding columnrnamounts differ by 8.2 +/- 7.0 %. These differences canrnbe explained by a scaling factor in the spectroscopicrndata base for HNO_3 which has been applied in versionrn4.61.rnSCIAMACHY O_3 and NO_2 column amounts of versionsrn5.01 agree much better as compared to previousrnversions: The difference of SCIAMACHY O_3 columnrnamounts is about 8 % when compared to FTIR datarnfrom Kiruna and about 2 % when compared with DOASrndata from Izaña, respectively. The difference ofrnSCIAMACHY NO_2 column amounts to Izaña DOASrndata is about 9 %.rnFurthermore, O_3 limb profiles from SCIAMACHY havernbeen compared for the first time. The mean differencesrnare up to 20%. However, shifting the SCIAMACHYrnprofiles by +1.5 km reduces the discrepanciesrnsignificantly. Then the mean relative difference isrnsmaller than 10% for all altitude levels between 10 andrn35 km. This shift is consistent with the erroneous heightrnassignment of MIPAS profiles.
机译:在这个ENVISAT验证项目[AOID-191]中,已在北极的基律纳和亚热带的特内里费岛进行了基于地面的不同技术的测量。这些基于地面的数据用于验证SCIAMACHY和MIPASrndata。使用在压力等级上的MIPAS 4.61 O_3剖面并将其垂直分辨率降级为FTIRrn剖面的分辨率,证明了很好的一致性。 FTIR O_3轮廓的精度约为10%。 MIPAS和FTIR之间的差异在组合误差栏中。rnMIPAS 4.61 HNO_3剖面在15公里以上的海拔高度大约相差10%至15%。相应的色谱柱含量相差8.2 +/- 7.0%。可以通过在版本rn4.61中应用的HNO_3光谱数据库中的比例因子来解释这些差异。rnSCIAMACHY O_3和版本rn5.01的NO_2列数量相比以前的版本要好得多:SCIAMACHY O_3列数量的差异约为8与来自基律纳(Kiruna)的FTIR数据相比,分别为%和与来自伊萨尼亚(Izaña)的DOASrndata(相比)分别约为2%。 SCIAMACHY NO_2列与IzañaDOASrndata的差额约为9%。rn此外,首次对SCIAMACHY的O_3肢体轮廓进行了比较。平均差异高达20%。但是,将SCIAMACHYrn轮廓偏移+1.5 km可以显着减小差异。然后,在10至35公里之间的所有海拔高度上,平均相对差均小于10%。此偏移与MIPAS配置文件的错误高度分配一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号