首页> 外文会议>Proceedings of the Joint International Conference on Electric Vehicular Technology and Industrial, Mechanical, Electrical and Chemical Engineering >Comparison of maximum torque per Ampere and Constant Torque Angle control for 30kw Interior Interior Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor
【24h】

Comparison of maximum torque per Ampere and Constant Torque Angle control for 30kw Interior Interior Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor

机译:30kw内装永磁同步电动机的每安培最大转矩和恒定转矩角控制的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this paper the comparison of Maximum Torque per Ampere (MTPA) and Constant Torque Angle (CTA) control for 30kW Interior Interior Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor (IPMSM) is presented. MTPA is usually used for IPMSM which has a large saliency ratio for optimum torque in the machine. But for a small saliency ratio machine, MTPA control may be not produce significant result. In order to verify the analytical results, the same sample motor is verified by using Finite Element Analysis (FEA). This verification shows that MTPA and CTA gives results as expected. It also can be shown that for small saliency motor, MTPA control has not significant extra torque compare to CTA, thus the selection of MTPA for IPMSM can be re-considered. This method is quite useful in IPMSM drive application to choose the best control for IPMSM, especially when the motors have a small saliency.
机译:本文比较了30kW内部内部永磁同步电动机(IPMSM)的最大每安培转矩(MTPA)和恒定转矩角(CTA)控制。 MTPA通常用于IPMSM,其显着性比高,可以在机器中获得最佳扭矩。但是对于小型显着性机器,MTPA控制可能不会产生明显的效果。为了验证分析结果,使用有限元分析(FEA)验证了同一样本电动机。此验证表明MTPA和CTA可以达到预期的结果。还可以表明,对于小型凸极电机,MTPA控制与CTA相比没有明显的额外转矩,因此可以重新考虑为IPMSM选择MTPA。该方法在IPMSM驱动器应用中非常有用,可以为IPMSM选择最佳控制,尤其是在电动机的凸度较小的情况下。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号