【24h】

How to compare program comprehension in FOSD empirically

机译:如何从经验上比较FOSD中的程序理解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

There are many different implementation approaches to realize the vision of feature-oriented software development, ranging from simple preprocessors, over feature-oriented programming, to sophisticated aspect-oriented mechanisms. Their impact on readability and maintainability (or program comprehension in general) has caused a debate among researchers, but sound empirical results are missing. We report experience from our endeavor to conduct experiments to measure the influence of different implementation mechanisms on program comprehension. We describe how to design such experiments and report from possibilities and pitfalls we encountered. Finally, we present some early results of our first experiment on comparing the CPP tool with the CIDE tool.
机译:从简单的预处理器到基于功能的编程,再到复杂的面向方面的机制,有很多不同的实现方法可以实现面向功能的软件开发的愿景。它们对可读性和可维护性(或总体上对程序理解)的影响引起了研究人员的争论,但是缺少可靠的经验结果。我们汇报了我们进行实验以测量不同实施机制对程序理解的影响的经验。我们描述了如何设计此类实验,并从遇到的可能性和陷阱中进行报告。最后,我们提供了第一个实验的一些早期结果,该实验是将CPP工具与CIDE工具进行比较的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号