首页> 外文会议>The proceedings of the fifteenth (2005) international offshore and polar engineering conference (ISOPE-2005 Seoul) >Wave-Induced Pipeline On-bottom Stability: Comparisons between Pipe -Soil and Wave-Pipe -SoilInteraction Models
【24h】

Wave-Induced Pipeline On-bottom Stability: Comparisons between Pipe -Soil and Wave-Pipe -SoilInteraction Models

机译:波浪引起的管道底部稳定性:管道-土壤和波浪-管道-土壤相互作用模型之间的比较

获取原文

摘要

To have a better insight into the mechanism of wave-induced pipelineon-bottom stability, the pipe-soil interaction model (Wagner et al., 1987)and the wave-pipe-soil interaction model (Gao et al., 2003) arecompared intensively in this paper. This includes the comparisons oftheir experimental setups, procedure of tests, phenomena of pipe losingstability etc. The comparison indicates that the critical lines for theinstability of anti-rolling pipeline and freely-laid pipeline in theempirical wave-pipe-soil interaction model overall agree with thedesign values , based on both simplified and generalized methods inDnV standard, respectively. However, with the increase of Froudenumber, the generalized method in DnV standard becomes moreconservative than the wave-pipe-soil interaction model for the onbottomstability design of pipeline. Therefore, wave–pipe-soil couplingeffects should be taken into account when we analyze the on-bottomstability pipeline under wave loading.
机译:更好地了解波导管的机理 底部稳定性,管-土相互作用模型(Wagner等,1987) 波浪-管道-土壤相互作用模型(Gao et al。,2003)是 在本文中进行了集中比较。这包括以下方面的比较 他们的实验装置,测试程序,管道丢失现象 稳定性等。比较表明 防滚流管道和自由铺设管道的不稳定性 经验的波-管-土相互作用模型总体上符合 基于简化和通用方法的设计值。 DnV标准。但是,随着弗洛德的增加 数字,DnV标准中的通用方法变得更多 底部比波管-土壤相互作用模型更保守 管道稳定性设计。因此,波-管-土耦合 我们在分析底部时应考虑到影响 波浪荷载下的稳定管道。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号