【24h】

Comparing Ethernet and Myrinet for MPI communication

机译:比较以太网和Myrinet进行MPI通信

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper compares the performance of Myrinet and Ethernet as a communication substrate for MPI libraries. MPI library implementations for Myrinet utilize user-level communication protocols to provide low latency and high bandwidth MPI messaging. In contrast, MPI library implementations for Ethernet utilize the operating system network protocol stack, leading to higher message latency and lower message bandwidth. However, on the NAS benchmarks, GM messaging over Myrinet only achieves 5% higher application performance than TCP messaging over Ethernet. Furthermore, efficient TCP messaging implmentations improve communication latency tolerance, which closes the performance gap between Myrinet and Ethernet to about 0.3% on the NAS benchmarks. This shows that commodity networking, if used efficiently, can be a viable alternative to specialized networking for high-performance message passing.
机译:本文比较了Myrinet和以太网作为MPI库的通信基础的性能。 Myrinet的MPI库实现利用用户级通信协议来提供低延迟和高带宽MPI消息传递。相反,用于以太网的MPI库实现使用操作系统网络协议栈,从而导致更高的消息延迟和更低的消息带宽。但是,在NAS基准测试中,通过Myrinet传输的GM消息仅比通过以太网传输的TCP消息实现5%的应用程序性能提高。此外,有效的TCP消息传递功能可改善通信延迟容忍度,从而将Myrinet和以太网之间的性能差距缩小到NAS基准测试的约0.3%。这表明,如果有效地利用商品网络,则可以替代用于高性能消息传递的专用网络。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号