首页> 外文会议>Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Conference on Deep Foundations >CASE STUDY: MGM CASINONATIONAL HARBOR, WASHINGTON, DC DISPLACEMENT CAST-IN-PLACE PILES IN COASTAL PLAIN SOILS
【24h】

CASE STUDY: MGM CASINONATIONAL HARBOR, WASHINGTON, DC DISPLACEMENT CAST-IN-PLACE PILES IN COASTAL PLAIN SOILS

机译:案例研究:沿海平原土壤中的MGM盐化港,华盛顿特区,直流位移现浇桩

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Displacement Cast-in-Place (DCIP) piles are not a common deep foundation type in the Washington, DCrnMetro Area market. As a result, less regional data is available for these foundations compared to otherrnalternate deep foundation types. Displacement cast-in-place piles (DCIP) differ from traditional AugerrnCast-In-Place (ACIP) piles in that the pile annulus is formed by pushing a partially-flighted, auger bit torndepth via a large mandrel. The auger bit includes a displacing body near the bottom of the tooling.rnTherefore, little to no spoils are generated during installation and the soil around the annulus is largelyrndensified in-place due to the displacing body being slightly larger than the mandrel it is attached to.rnDue to this densification, one would expect that the theoretical DCIP capacities (compression or tension)rnwould be greater than an ACIP pile (assuming a pile of similar length and diameter). After 20 static loadrntests and the installation of over 6,000+ piles on the MGM National Harbor Casino Project, therndifferences in pile support characteristics between DCIP and ACIP piles of same size and depth wasrnsmall. The performance of both pile types depended on the density and type of soil within the bearingrnstratum. In some early cases of DCIP use, the performance exceeded expectations and appeared to bernmore in line (or better) than typical capacities obtained from driven displacement piles. Other times, therntip elevations could not be achieved or were so difficult to achieve that installation delays occurred and/orrnsignificant additional engineering effort was required to address piles short of their requirementrnembedment.rnThis paper will discuss the limitations of DCIP pile installation in dense Coastal Plain soils and willrnpresent the lessons learned during this project. The paper will also compare the DCIP pile type to bothrnconventional ACIP and driven displacement piles utilizing regional and site-specific load test andrninstallation data.
机译:在华盛顿特区市区市场中,位移现场浇铸(DCIP)桩不是常见的深基础类型。结果,与其他替代性深层基础类型相比,可用于这些基础的区域数据更少。置换式现浇桩(DCIP)与传统的AugerrnCast-In-place(ACIP)桩的不同之处在于,桩的环面是通过将一个部分钻探的螺旋钻头通过一个大的心轴推入深度而形成的。螺旋钻头在工具底部附近有一个位移体。因此,在安装过程中几乎没有产生任何损坏,并且由于位移体比其所附着的心轴稍大,因此环空周围的土壤在很大程度上被致密化。由于这种致密化,人们可以期望理论上的DCIP容量(压缩或拉力)将大于ACIP桩(假定桩的长度和直径相似)。在米高梅国家港口赌场项目进行20次静载荷测试并安装了6,000多个桩之后,相同尺寸和深度的DCIP和ACIP桩之间桩支撑特性的差异很小。两种桩的性能都取决于承载层内土壤的密度和类型。在某些早期使用DCIP的情况下,性能超出了预期,并且似乎比从驱动排量桩获得的典型能力更能满足要求(或更好)。其他时候,无法达到顶高或很难达到顶高,以至于发生安装延误和/或需要大量额外的工程工作来解决无法满足要求的桩基的问题。本文将讨论DCIP桩在密集的沿海平原土壤中安装的局限性。并将介绍在该项目中吸取的教训。本文还将利用区域和特定地点的载荷测试和安装数据,将DCIP桩类型与常规ACIP桩和驱动位移桩进行比较。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 会议地点
  • 作者单位

    Senior Project Engineer, ECS Mid-Atlantic, LLC, 14026 Thunderbolt Place, Suite 100, Chantilly, Virginia, USA, Tel: 703-471-8400: jracine@ecslimited.com;

    Chief Engineer, ECS Mid-Atlantic, LLC, 14026 Thunderbolt Place, Suite 100, Chantilly, Virginia, USA, Tel: 703-471-8400: khiggins@ecslimited.com;

  • 会议组织
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号