首页> 外文会议>Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGCOMM on internet measurement conference >'Airshark: Detecting Non-WiFi RF Devices Using Commodity WiFi Hardware'
【24h】

'Airshark: Detecting Non-WiFi RF Devices Using Commodity WiFi Hardware'

机译:“ Airshark:使用商品WiFi硬件检测非WiFi RF设备”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Strengths: Though overstated repeatedly, the use of typical hardware is a strength. The study of 20 locations and the interfering objects in each is a bit of a contribution as a spot check (not as contribution #1). Weaknesses: The writing is poor, redundant, and compressed at a low level, making it difficult to extract the key scientific contributions: why this work was technically difficult and what novel method emerged to address that problem. The practical implication is not quite apparent: if performance is poor, perhaps the remedy is the same no matter what the issue is. Comments to Authors: Should APs simply change channels whenever performance is poor to find another? Does it matter whether the channel is simply oversubscribed by someone streaming video over 802.11 or is someone talking on a phone? I suspect not. This leaves much of your work an oversell: it's great that you can do this, and I think it may have implications for backoff parameters and rate selection, and maybe even pop-ups for the user, but it doesn't mean much for channel selection.
机译:优点:尽管反复强调,但使用典型硬件是一种优点。对20个位置和每个区域中的干扰对象的研究作为抽查的一部分贡献(而不是贡献1)。劣势:写作拙劣,冗长且压缩程度低,难以提取关键的科学贡献:为什么这项工作在技术上很困难,以及出现了什么新颖的方法来解决该问题。实际含义不是很明显:如果性能很差,那么不管问题是什么,补救措施都是相同的。对作者的评论:当性能不佳时,AP是否应该简单地更改渠道以寻找另一个?该通道是仅仅被某人通过802.11流式传输视频只是超额订阅还是某人正在通过电话通话是否重要?我怀疑不是。这会使您的许多工作超卖:您可以做的很好,我认为这可能会对退避参数和速率选择产生影响,甚至可能会给用户带来弹出式窗口,但对渠道而言意义不大选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号