首页> 外文会议>Proceedings of the 17th annual north American waste to energy conference >ALTERNATIVE FINANCING FOR ENHANCED ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION: THE INTERSECTION OF WASTE-TO-ENERGY TECHNOLOGY AND SOLID WASTE FLOW CONTROL AUTHORITY
【24h】

ALTERNATIVE FINANCING FOR ENHANCED ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION: THE INTERSECTION OF WASTE-TO-ENERGY TECHNOLOGY AND SOLID WASTE FLOW CONTROL AUTHORITY

机译:加强环境保护的替代性融资:废物能源技术与固体废物流控制权的交叉

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

When local governments evaluate the environmental benefits and costs of alternatives for managing non-recyclable municipal solid waste, the relative costs of modern waste-to-energy (WTE) technology can be a significant stumbling block despite WTE technology's environmental benefits. Although the preceding point is an important economic reality that has constrained WTE development in the United States, fortunately there is a highly effective means -the use of municipal solid waste "flow control" (or "facility designation") authority - to overcome WTE's perceived cost disadvantage.^' The relationship between flow control and WTE development, including significant encouragement for use of flow control as a result of the U.S. Supreme Court's recent decision in United Haulers Association v. Oneida-Herkimer Solid Waste Management Authority, 127 S.Ct. 1786 (2007), is the focus of this paper, which will address the following topics:
机译:当地方政府评估环境收益和管理不可回收的城市固体废物替代品的成本时,尽管WTE技术具有环境效益,但现代废物能源转换(WTE)技术的相对成本可能是一个重大障碍。尽管上述观点是制约WTE在美国发展的重要经济现实,但幸运的是,存在一种非常有效的手段-利用城市固体废物“流量控制”(或“设施指定”)权限-克服WTE的认知成本劣势。流量控制与WTE发展之间的关系,包括由于美国最高法院最近在联合搬运工协会(United Haulers Association)诉Oneida-Herkimer固体废物管理局127 S.Ct案中的判决而大力鼓励使用流量控制。 。 1786(2007)是本文的重点,它将探讨以下主题:

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号