首页> 外文会议>POWER-GEN Europe 2005 >POLAND’S POWER SECTOR FEELING THECONSOLIDATION HEAT
【24h】

POLAND’S POWER SECTOR FEELING THECONSOLIDATION HEAT

机译:波兰的电力部门正在为整合热

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The Polish energy sector was by far the largest “new entrant” to the joint EU energy market inrnMay 2004. Now, one year into Poland’s EU membership, are there any Polish players visible inrnthe market? Or has EU membership finally helped along Poland’s stalled privatization process,rnpaving the way for large European utility companies to buy up Polish companies? The answer tornboth questions is a clear “no”, and this article will explain why this is the case. It will then go onrnto describe possible scenarios for mid-term development of the Polish power sector.rnThe debate in Poland has to be seen against the background of the European energy industry,rnwhere consolidation is in full swing again. This is illustrated by the marked increase of M&Arnactivity in 2004 and if looking at the combined market share of E.ON, RWE and EdF, whichrngrew from about 14% to more than 25 % between 1998 and 2003, and is bound to rise further.rnAll major European utility companies are active in Central and Eastern Europe, and Poland, asrnkey target areas for expansion. As in most CEE countries, Polish companies appear to have littlernto oppose to such powerful competitors. Neither do they possess the necessary critical size forrnsubstantial investments, nor do they grow fast enough, let alone internationally, to maintain theirrnrelative market position. CEZ, the Czech power generation and distribution company might bernthe only exception to the rule in the region.rnThe threat of Polish companies not surviving this consolidation has called both companies andrnpoliticians to action. A heated debate on the creation of one or more national champions byrnpermitting vertical integration has dominated energy policy and sector lobbying efforts inrnPoland throughout 2004 and early 2005. The power generators make the case together with thernState Treasury that allowing them to take over distribution assets would greatly increase thernprivatization proceeds for the state budget. The distribution companies with the Ministry of thernEconomy and the Energy Regulator on the other side, fear that competition and, ultimately, therncustomer, suffer if they are to be gulped by generation-focused generation giants.rnWhile not concluded yet, this discussion has at last defined an alternative to the previous,rnpiecemeal approach of privatizing assets in the energy sector whenever budget emergenciesrndemand it, while defining other assets as “strategic state properties” exempt from privatizationrnin order to avoid “national sell out”.rnThis paper outlines some possible scenarios regarding further consolidation and privatization inrnthe Polish power sector. The authors argue that there exists no alternative to vertical integrationrnand privatization. What Poland needs are strong, vertically integrated, privately-owned utilityrncompanies with a growth perspective and a substantial degree of value creation within therncountry. Whether generators take over distributors or vice versa is as secondary, as is therncountry of origin of the investor. Important is that the Polish economy profits from the presencernof viable, growing energy companies rather than just supplying generation or sales outlets ofrnsubordinary significance in international energy groups in the mid to long term perspective.
机译:波兰的能源部门是2004年5月进入欧盟联合能源市场的最大“新进入者”。现在,波兰加入欧盟成为会员国已有一年,有没有波兰的参与者参与市场?还是欧盟成员国资格最终帮助波兰陷入停滞的私有化进程,为大型欧洲公用事业公司收购波兰公司铺平了道路?这两个问题的答案都是明确的“否”,本文将解释为什么会这样。然后,它将继续描述波兰电力行业的中期发展的可能情况。在波兰的辩论必须在欧洲能源行业的背景下进行,而欧洲能源行业又将全面展开合并。 2004年并购活动的显着增加说明了这一点,如果再看E.ON,RWE和EdF的合并市场份额,1998年至2003年间,该市场份额将从大约14%上升到25%以上,并且势必会进一步上升。所有主要的欧洲公用事业公司都活跃在中欧和东欧以及波兰,这是其扩展目标区域。像大多数中东欧国家一样,波兰公司似乎很少反对这样强大的竞争对手。它们既没有必要的关键规模进行大量投资,也没有足够快地增长,更不用说国际上保持其相对市场地位了。捷克发电和配电公司CEZ可能是该地区唯一的例外。rn波兰公司未能幸免于此合并的威胁已促使公司和政治人物采取行动。在整个2004年至2005年初,关于通过允许垂直整合来建立一个或多个国家冠军的激烈辩论一直主导着inrnPoland的能源政策和部门游说工作。发电商与国库一起证明,允许他们接管配电资产将极大增加国家预算的私有化收益。与经济部和能源监管部在另一侧的配电公司担心,如果竞争将被最终一代的发电巨头吞并,最终损害客户,他们将遭受苦难。虽然尚未结束,但这场讨论终于结束了定义了以前的零散方法的替代方案,该方法是在预算紧急情况下对能源部门的资产进行私有化,同时将其他资产定义为免于私有化的“战略性国有资产”,以避免“国家出售”。本文概述了一些可能的方案进一步的整合和私有化使波兰电力部门陷入困境。作者认为,垂直整合和私有化没有其他选择。波兰需要的是强大的,垂直整合的,私营的公用事业公司,这些公司具有增长前景,并在国家内部创造了相当大的价值创造。发电机是接管分销商还是反向接管分销商,以及投资者的原籍国都是次要的。重要的是,从中长期来看,波兰经济从存在的,有生存能力的,不断发展的能源公司中获利,而不仅仅是在国际能源集团中提供不重要的发电或销售渠道。

著录项

  • 来源
    《POWER-GEN Europe 2005》|2005年|1-19|共19页
  • 会议地点 Milan(IT)
  • 作者

    Jochen Hauff; Maciej Drozd;

  • 作者单位

    A.T. Kearney, Warsaw jochen.hauff@atkearney.com;

    A.T. Kearney, Warsaw;

  • 会议组织
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号