首页> 外文会议>Offshore Technology Conference;ExxonMobil;FMCTechnologies;Schlumberger >To Buckle or Not to Buckle - Best Practices for HP/HT Pipelines Lateral Buckling Design in Shallow Water
【24h】

To Buckle or Not to Buckle - Best Practices for HP/HT Pipelines Lateral Buckling Design in Shallow Water

机译:屈曲或不屈曲-浅水中HP / HT管道横向屈曲设计的最佳实践

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Mitigation of lateral buckling is one of the key design challenges for HP/HT subsea pipelines. Case studiesrnof lateral buckling designs in shallow water developments are used to examine the merits and shortcomingsrnof the different mitigation techniques. The case studies include both Greenfield and Brownfieldrndevelopments as well as existing pipelines in operation. The assessment covers the design methodology,rndesign challenges and methodology adopted to overcome those challenges as well as interaction withrnother pipeline design activities. Key factors such as technical feasibility, constructability and costeffectivenessrnof the different mitigation techniques are considered.rnThe different lateral buckling mitigation techniques described are generally applicable to subsearnpipelines in shallow water developments. The methods can be classified into two main approaches. Thernfirst is to prevent buckling and the second is to allow buckling to occur in a controlled manner. Hence,rna key decision for the designer is whether to aim for buckle prevention or buckle control i.e. to buckle orrnnot to buckle.rnThe assessment of the different techniques used for lateral buckling demonstrates that there is no ‘onernsize fits all’ solution. Unlike deep water applications where buckle prevention might be technicallyrnunfeasible or prohibitively expensive, the prevalence of shallow water in the Arabian Gulf region makesrnboth buckle prevention and buckle control generally feasible and cost effective solution. However, eachrnmitigation approach has its own pros and cons as well as limitations on its applicability and therefore thernmitigation approach should be determined on a case by case basis based on comprehensive technoeconomicrnassessment. Hence, understanding the merits and shortcomings of the different approaches isrnconsidered instrumental for proper selection of lateral buckling mitigation technique.rnThis paper provides guidance to the designer for the selection of mitigation approach throughrnconsolidation of the understanding of the merits and shortcomings of typical lateral buckling mitigationrntechniques in shallow water applications.
机译:减轻横向屈曲是HP / HT海底管道的主要设计挑战之一。案例研究浅水开发中的侧向屈曲设计被用来检验各种缓解技术的优缺点。案例研究包括Greenfield和Brownfieldrn开发项目,以及正在运行的现有管道。该评估涵盖设计方法,设计挑战以及克服这些挑战所采用的方法,以及与其他管道设计活动的互动。考虑了不同缓解技术的关键因素,例如技术可行性,可施工性和成本效益。所描述的不同横向屈曲缓解技术通常适用于浅水开发中的地下管线。这些方法可以分为两种主要方法。第一个是防止屈曲,第二个是允许以受控方式发生屈曲。因此,设计人员的主要决策是要防止弯折还是控制弯折,即要弯折还是不弯折。对横向弯折使用的不同技术的评估表明,没有“大小合适的整体”解决方案。与在技术上无法实现防弯折或昂贵的防止深弯的深水应用不同,阿拉伯海湾地区浅水的普遍使用使得防弯和防弯控制在总体上是可行且成本有效的解决方案。但是,每种缓解方法都有其自身的优缺点,并且在适用性方面存在局限性,因此应根据具体的技术经济评估情况,逐案确定缓解方法。因此,了解不同方法的优缺点被认为是对横向屈曲缓解技术的正确选择的工具。本文通过巩固对典型横向屈曲缓解技术的优缺点的理解,为设计者提供了指导。浅水应用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号