首页> 外文会议>Ninth International Symposium on the Science amp; Technology of Light Sources (LS:9); Aug 12-16, 2001; Ithaca, NY, USA >USING BRIGHTNESS AND COLOR GAMUT TO ASSESS SPECTRA OPTIMIZED FOR LUMINOSITY AND COLOR RENDERING
【24h】

USING BRIGHTNESS AND COLOR GAMUT TO ASSESS SPECTRA OPTIMIZED FOR LUMINOSITY AND COLOR RENDERING

机译:使用亮度和色彩校正来评估针对亮度和色彩渲染优化的光谱

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

General-purpose white-light sources are traditionally optimized for both high luminous efficiency (efficacy) and high color rendition. Maximum efficacy corresponds to efficient use of electrical power for economical operation. High color rendering corresponds to the ideal that objects illuminated by the source should have the most similar possible appearance to objects illuminated by a corresponding blackbody or Planckian radiator. Much can be learned from manipulation of the spectral power distribution φ(λ) of a light source without reference to the physical properties of a particular lamp. In particular, one can separate the lamp efficacy into (ⅰ) the spectral luminosity η (lumens per radiated watt) and (ⅱ) the efficiency of electrical-to-visible conversion. The spectral luminosity, chromaticity, and color rendering index (CRI) are completely determined by the emitted spectral power distribution in the wavelength range 390-750 nm, and hence can be investigated without reference to whether the light source is fluorescent, metal halide, or solid-state. There is a fundamental tradeoff between luminosity and CRI, so a common approach, used here and elsewhere, is to fix the chromaticity of the spectrum, choose a value (or range of values) for CRI, and then iteratively improve the spectrum to maximize its luminosity within these constraints. While many connections have been made between luminosity and various human performance measures, the link between CRI and visual performance is much less certain. Here spectra are optimized first for luminosity and CRI, and also for an alternative set of performance measures: brightness and color gamut. These alternate measures are not proposed as superior to luminosity and CRI, but rather are taken to be reasonable alternatives for the purpose of testing the conclusions reached based on spectra optimized for luminosity and CRI.
机译:传统上,通用白光源针对高发光效率(效率)和高色彩再现进行了优化。最大功效对应于为经济运行而有效使用电力。高显色性对应于理想情况,即光源所照明的对象应具有与相应黑体或普朗克辐射体所照明的对象最相似的外观。从光源的光谱功率分布φ(λ)的操纵中可以学到很多,而无需参考特定灯的物理特性。特别地,可以将灯的效率分为(ⅰ)光谱光度η(每辐射瓦特的流明)和(ⅱ)电到可见转换的效率。光谱的光度,色度和显色指数(CRI)完全由390-750 nm波长范围内发出的光谱功率分布决定,因此可以在不考虑光源是荧光灯,金属卤化物还是荧光灯的情况下进行研究。固体状态。在亮度和CRI之间存在一个基本的权衡,因此在此处和其他地方使用的一种通用方法是固定光谱的色度,为CRI选择一个值(或值的范围),然后迭代地改善光谱以最大化其CRI。这些限制内的发光度。尽管在亮度和各种人类绩效指标之间已建立了许多联系,但CRI与视觉绩效之间的联系尚不确定。在这里,光谱首先针对发光度和CRI进行了优化,还针对一组替代的性能指标进行了优化:亮度和色域。这些替代措施并未提出优于亮度和CRI的建议,而是被认为是合理的替代方法,目的是测试基于针对亮度和CRI优化的光谱得出的结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号