【24h】

IS QUANTUM MECHANICS NON-LOCAL?

机译:量子力学是非本地的吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this paper I look at a number of issue surrounding the question of the title. I will begin with a report of a recent paper by Beckman et al where they examine the issue of a certain type of locality and differentiate it from the idea of causality (no "faster than light" signaling), and show that, surprisingly, the former is slighlty more restrictive than the latter. I then discuss H. Stapp's argument that one can demonstrate the non-locality of Quantum mechanics by showing that one obtains a contradiction with th predictions of quantum mechanics if one assumes that quantum mechanics is local, and that certain counterfactual lines of argument are valid. Finally I conclude with a statement of my position that quantum mechanics is local, presenting a simple field theoretic analysis of a Bell type experiment. Using this I argue that the quantum correlations present in such a Bell experiment are the result of a common cause, just as they are in the case of classical correlations.
机译:在本文中,我将围绕标题问题探讨许多问题。我将从贝克曼等人最近发表的一篇论文的报告开始,他们研究了某种类型的局部性问题,并将其与因果关系的思想区分开(没有“比光速快”的信号),并且令人惊讶地表明,前者比后者更为严格。然后我讨论了H.Stapp的论点,即可以通过证明如果假设量子力学是局部的,并且某些反事实论点是有效的,则表明与量子力学的预测矛盾,从而可以证明量子力学的非局部性。最后,我以关于量子力学是局部性的立场作为结论,对贝尔型实验进行了简单的场理论分析。利用这一点,我认为在贝尔实验中存在的量子相关性是常见原因的结果,就像在经典相关性中一样。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号