首页> 外文会议>ASME International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering >COMPARISON OF FATIGUE DESIGN CODES WITH FOCUS ON OFFSHORE STRUCTURES
【24h】

COMPARISON OF FATIGUE DESIGN CODES WITH FOCUS ON OFFSHORE STRUCTURES

机译:疲劳设计代码与近海结构的疲劳设计代码

获取原文

摘要

Different codes are used in the industry for the fatigue design of offshore structures. Because the fatigue phenomenon is very sensitive to different design conditions, standards select those with higher impact and try to cover all other unpredictable factors making use of safety factors. To the authors' knowledge there is not any comparison of fatigue codes with focus on analyzing the strength and limitations of the design approaches and safety factors included in each one available. This paper has the aim of comparing a number of recognized fatigue design codes for this purpose. Based on this review BS (British Standard) presents the most complete information for offshore design applying the fracture mechanics approach while DNV (Det Norske Veritas) offers the most updated and complete information for fatigue design applying the endurance approach. The safety factors contemplated in the codes are not always comparable and consequently it is not possible to confirm whether one standard is more or less conservative than the others.
机译:不同的代码在工业上用于海上结构的疲劳设计。因为疲劳现象是不同的设计条件非常敏感,标准选择那些具有较高的影响,并试图掩盖利用的安全因素,所有其他不可预测的因素。据作者所知没有疲劳码,重点是分析包括在每一个可用的强度和接近设计的局限性和安全因素的任何比较。本文有比较若干公认的疲劳设计规范用于此目的的目的。在此基础上检讨BS(英国标准)的礼物应用断裂力学的接近而DNV(挪威船级社)提供了疲劳设计应用耐力的做法最新,最完​​整的信息离岸设计最完整的信息。在代码考虑的安全因素并不总是可比的,因此它是不可能确认一个标准是否比别人更多或更少的保守。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号