首页> 外文会议>Joint annual meeting of the International Society of Exposure Science and the International Society for Environmental Epidemiology >Evaluation of a Method to Indirectly Adjust for Unmeasured Covariates in Large Administrative Data Cohort Analyses: An Analysis of Associations between Fine Particulate Matter and Mortality in the 2001 Canadian Census Health and Environment Cohort (2001 C
【24h】

Evaluation of a Method to Indirectly Adjust for Unmeasured Covariates in Large Administrative Data Cohort Analyses: An Analysis of Associations between Fine Particulate Matter and Mortality in the 2001 Canadian Census Health and Environment Cohort (2001 C

机译:对大规模行政数据群组中的未测量协调会进行间接调整方法的评价:2001年加拿大人口普查卫生与环境队列中细颗粒物质与死亡率之间的协会分析(2001年

获取原文

摘要

Background. The method of indirect adjustment for unmeasured confounding is a promising technique in large cohort studies, however no formal evaluation of non-linear survival models has been conducted. Objectives: To describe and evaluate the indirect adjustment method for air pollution -mortality relationships with a large longitudinal cohort, the 2001 Canadian Census Health and Environment Cohort (CanCHEC, N=2.4 million), and a representative matching dataset (pooled cycles of the Canadian Community Health Survey, [CCHS], N=450,000) with detailed behavioural risk factor information. Methods: We compared the distribution of exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) among subjects across multiple characteristics (age, sex, etc.), and examined the direction and magnitude of correlations amongst variables common to both datasets. We assessed the performance of indirect adjustment on non-linear Cox proportional hazard models by comparing estimates in the CanCHEC with and without indirect adjustment for known variables. Further, we estimated the degree of bias correction by removing variables available in both the CCHS and CanCHEC (e.g. education, income) and evaluated differences. Results: At baseline PM2.5 distribution profiles across population characteristics were similar in both cohorts. PM2.5 levels for CCHS participants tended to consistently be 1.8-2.0 μg/m3 lower than the CanCHEC cohort, likely due to sampling differences between urban and rural areas since applying a sample-weighting scheme to the CCHS largely corrected for this discrepancy. Initial non-linear validation tests indicate possible underestimation of the PM2.5 association with further testing on-going. Conclusions: Formal evaluation using a large longitudinal mortality cohort and representative health survey will help establish protocols that other jurisdictions can use to assess the viability of the indirect adjustment method when information on potential confounding variables are not available.
机译:背景。对未测量混淆的间接调整方法是大队列研究中有希望的技术,但没有进行正式评估非线性存活模型。目的:要描述和评估空气污染的间接调整方法 - 与大型纵向队列,2001年加拿大人口普查健康和环境队列(CANCHEC,N = 240万)和代表匹配数据集(加拿大人的汇总周期)社区健康调查,[CCHS],N = 450,000),具有详细的行为风险因素信息。方法:与多种特征(年龄,性别等)的受试者中,将暴露于细颗粒物质(PM2.5)的分布进行了比较,并检查了两个数据集共有的变量之间的相关方向和大小。通过将CANCHEC中的估计与已知变量进行间接调整,通过比较CANCHEC中的估计来评估对非线性COX比例危险模型的间接调整的性能。此外,我们估计通过消除CCHS和CANCHEC(例如教育,收入)和评估差异的可用变量来估计偏差校正程度。结果:在基线PM2.5跨人群特征的分布概况在两个队列中都相似。 CCHS参与者的PM2.5级别往往比CANCHEC队列低于CANCHEC队列,这可能是由于城乡之间的采样差异,因为自从将样品加权方案应用于基本纠正这种差异的CCH。初始非线性验证测试表明PM2.5与进一步测试的PM2.5关联可能低估。结论:使用大型纵向死亡率群体和代表性健康调查的正式评估将有助于建立其他司法管辖区可以使用的协议来评估间接调整方法的可行性,但当潜在混淆变量的信息不可用。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号