Predicting Low vs. High Disparity between Peer and Expert Ratings in Peer Reviews of Physics Lab Reports

摘要

Our interest in this work is to automatically predict whether peer ratings have high or low agreement in terms of disparity with instructor ratings, using solely features extracted from quantitative peer ratings and text-based peer comments. Experimental results suggest that our model can indeed outperform a majority baseline in predicting low versus high rating disparity. Furthermore, the reliability of both peer ratings and comments (in terms of peer disagreement) shows little correlation to disparity.