首页> 外文会议>IEEE Workshop on Power Electronics and Power Quality Applications >Performance Comparison of Voltage Control Strategies of VSC-HVDC Grids
【24h】

Performance Comparison of Voltage Control Strategies of VSC-HVDC Grids

机译:VSC-HVDC网格电压控制策略的性能比较

获取原文

摘要

Voltage source converters (VSC) based HVDC grids are a secure alternative for power transmission in the electric regional integration of many countries around the world, and the integration of renewable sources. The main objective of this paper is to compare the dynamic performance of three modes of control of VSC stations the voltage control methods “Control margin voltage” and “Droop control voltage” to show that the droop voltage control strategy has better results than the voltage margin control strategy. The performance of these controllers is evaluated by means of a perturbation on a VSC station that consists of outage of the negative pole over the bipolar converter station in the DC subsystem DSC3 of the CIGRE DC Grid benchmark test system. The dynamic simulation allows conclude that using a strategic voltage control like margin control voltage is possible have a better level of voltage and active power in the lines DC, the establishment time of the system is 6s. The droop control voltage with acceptable levels of voltage and active power can be faster, stabilizing the system at 1s.
机译:基于电压源转换器(VSC)的HVDC网格是世界各国许多国家的电气区域集成中的电力传输的安全替代方案,以及可再生能源的整合。本文的主要目的是比较VSC站的三种控制模式的动态性能,电压控制方法“控制边缘电压”和“下垂控制电压”,表明下垂电压控制策略具有比电压裕度更好的结果控制策略。这些控制器的性能通过VSC站的扰动来评估,该VSC站包括在CIGRE DC网格基准测试系统的DC子系统DSC3中的双极转换站上的负极中断。动态仿真允许得出结论,使用像边距控制电压的战略电压控制可以具有更好的电压和线路DC电压和有功功率,系统的建立时间为6S。下垂控制电压具有可接受的电压和有功功率水平,可以更快,稳定1S。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号