首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology >DEVELOPMENT OF TEST GUIDANCE FOR COMPACT TENSION FRACTURE TOUGHNESS SPECIMENS CONTAINING NOTCHES INSTEAD OF FATIGUE PRE-CRACKS
【24h】

DEVELOPMENT OF TEST GUIDANCE FOR COMPACT TENSION FRACTURE TOUGHNESS SPECIMENS CONTAINING NOTCHES INSTEAD OF FATIGUE PRE-CRACKS

机译:开发紧凑型裂缝断裂韧性试样的试验指导,含有缺口代替疲劳前裂缝

获取原文

摘要

Structural integrity assessment codes such as R6 and BS7910 provide guidance on the assessment of flaws that are assumed to be infinitely sharp. In many cases, such as fatigue cracks, this assumption is appropriate; however it can be pessimistic for flaws that do not have sharp tips such as lack of fusion, porosity or mechanical damage. Several methods have been proposed in the literature to quantify the additional margins that may be present for non-sharp defects compared to the margins that would be calculated if the defect were assumed to be a sharp crack A common feature of these methods is the need to understand how the effective toughness, characterised using the J-integral for a notch, varies with notch acuity. No comprehensive guidance currently exists for obtaining J experimentally from specimens containing notches; hence the typical approach is to use equations intended for pre-cracked specimens to calculate J for notched specimens. This paper presents a comprehensive set of test guidance for calculating J from Compact Tension (CT) fracture toughness specimens containing notches instead of fatigue pie-cracks. This has been achieved using 3D Finite Element Analyses to quantify the accuracy of formulae intended for pre-cracked specimens in fracture toughness testing standards ASTM E1820, BS7448-1 and ESIS P2-92 when applied to specimens containing notches. The paper quantifies the accuracy of these equations for notched CT specimens and identifies the conditions under which the equations can lead to inaccurate measurement of J for notched specimens.
机译:r6和bs7910等结构完整性评估代码为假设无限尖锐的缺陷的评估提供了指导。在许多情况下,如疲劳裂缝,这种假设是合适的;然而,对于没有尖锐的提示,例如缺乏融合,孔隙度或机械损坏,它可能是悲观的。在文献中提出了几种方法,以量化与将计算的边缘相比可能存在的额外边缘,如果假设缺陷被认为是尖锐的裂缝,这些方法的常见特征是需要的了解如何使用凹口的J-Intional的有效韧性,随着凹口而变化。目前没有全面的指导,用于从含有缺口的标本实验获取j;因此,典型的方法是使用旨在用于预裂纹标本的方程来计算缺口样本的J。本文介绍了一套全面的试验指导,用于计算含有缺口代替疲劳饼裂纹的紧凑张力(CT)断裂韧性试样的综合试验指导。这已被使用三维有限元分析时施加于含有缺口试样来量化旨在用于断裂韧性测试标准ASTM E1820,BS7448-1和ESIS P2-92预裂纹试样公式的精度来实现的。该纸张量化了缺口CT样本的这些等式的准确性,并识别了方程可以导致缺口标本不准确测量的条件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号