首页> 外文会议>ASSE Professional Development Conference >Process Safety vs. Personal Safety: Can't We Get Along with One?
【24h】

Process Safety vs. Personal Safety: Can't We Get Along with One?

机译:过程安全与个人安全:我们不能和一个人相处吗?

获取原文

摘要

The word "safety" is general in nature. This is used in different forms for different aspects, e.g., home safety, road safety, process safety, personal safety, and many more. However, coming to industry side and in particular to the oil & gas sector, two forms of safety are prominent and have significant impact in the business cycle, which are process safety and personal safety. Occupational (personal or personnel) safety is what is thought of when most people hear the word "safety." They think of trips, falls, struck against and the use of PPE. Traditionally, in the industry, focus of "safety" has been assumed to be totally described by the personal safety and related injury rates. If you ask any organization about their safety performance, the answer almost always was a statement of their incident rates which consists of injury frequency rates (IFR), lost time rates (LTR), total recordable incident rate, etc.
机译:“安全”一词本质上是一般的。这是以不同的形式使用的不同方面,例如家庭安全,道路安全,工艺安全,个人安全等等。然而,来到工业方面,特别是石油和天然气行业,两种安全性突出,在商业周期中产生重大影响,这是过程安全和个人安全。职业(个人或人员)安全是大多数人听到“安全”这个词的想法。他们想到旅行,跌倒,击中和使用PPE。传统上,在行业中,假设“安全”的重点是完全由个人安全和相关伤害率完全描述。如果您向任何组织提出有关其安全性能,答案几乎始终始终是他们的事故率,由伤害频率(IFR),损失时间率(LTR),总可录制事件率等。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号