【24h】

Testing Minimax for Rational Ignorant Agents

机译:测试Limax的Rational Ignorant代理

获取原文

摘要

Richard Pettigrew [13,14] defends the following theses: (1) epistemic disutility can be measured with strictly proper scoring rules (like the Brier score) and (2) at the beginning of their credal lives, rational agents ought to minimize their worst-case epistemic disutility (Minimax). This leads to a Principle of Indifference for ignorant agents. However, Pettigrew offers no argument in favour of Minimax, suggesting that the epistemic conservatism underlying it is a "normative bedrock." Is there a way to test Minimax? In this paper, we argue that, since Pettigrew's Minimax is impermissive, an argument against credence permissiveness constitutes an argument in favour of Minimax, and that arguments for credence permissiveness are arguments against Minimax.
机译:理查德Pettigrew [13,14]捍卫以下论文:(1)认知性宿舍可以用严格适当的评分规则(如Brier得分)和(2)开始在他们的唯一生活中,理性代理商应该尽量减少最糟糕的-cease认知宿舍(minimax)。这导致了对无知剂的漠不关心的原则。然而,Pettigrew没有有利于最低限度的论据,这表明这是一个底层的认知保守主义是“规范基岩”。有没有办法测试Minimax?在本文中,我们认为,由于Pettigrew的Minimax是不受限制的,反对信用允许的争论构成了有利于最低限度的论据,并且债务允许的论点是针对Minimax的论据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号