首页> 外文会议>IEEE Technology and Engineering Management Conference - Europe >Region-specific Institutional Context for Citizen-driven Entrepreneurship in Smart Cities: Evidence from Rome and Berlin
【24h】

Region-specific Institutional Context for Citizen-driven Entrepreneurship in Smart Cities: Evidence from Rome and Berlin

机译:智能城市中公民驱动创业的区域特定制度背景:来自罗马和柏林的证据

获取原文

摘要

During the last decades, the notion of smart cities emerges as one of the key concepts for improving urban areas and including citizens in entrepreneurship activities. The smart city concept should be considered as a multidimensional activity which is carefully balancing human, social, cultural, economic, environmental, and technological aspects to engage citizens to make urban change. The objective of this study is to question the role of citizen entrepreneurship in smart city development and analyse frameworks, strategic actions, and public policies which stipulate it. High levels of application of information and communication technologies (ICTs) and novel digital platforms enable numerous multiplicative benefits and allow the provision of innovative services, shifting our vocabulary to '`digital' and '`smart' services. With the proliferation of the concept of smart cities and disruptive digital tools, it is the entrepreneurs that stimulate the technological development of the cities to become smart. In this paper, the authors have analysed specific public policies that foster citizen entrepreneurship in Rome and Berlin smart cities concepts with the objectives of assessing types and depth of strategic actions that foster citizen-driven entrepreneurship and highlight the differences in frameworks and taxonomies in these two cities.
机译:在过去几十年中,智慧城市的概念成为改善城市地区和让公民参与创业活动的关键概念之一。智慧城市的概念应该被视为一种多层面的活动,它仔细地平衡了人类、社会、文化、经济、环境和技术等方面,让公民参与城市变革。本研究的目的是质疑公民创业在智慧城市发展中的作用,并分析框架、战略行动和公共政策。信息和通信技术(ICT)和新型数字平台的高水平应用带来了许多倍增效益,并允许提供创新服务,将我们的词汇转换为“数字”和“智能”服务。随着智能城市概念和颠覆性数字工具的扩散,正是企业家推动了城市的技术发展,使之成为智能城市。在本文中,作者分析了罗马和柏林智能城市概念中促进公民创业的具体公共政策,目的是评估促进公民创业的战略行动的类型和深度,并强调这两个城市在框架和分类法上的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号