【24h】

Ergonomic Performance Evaluation of Date Stripping Process

机译:符合人体工程学性能评估日期剥离过程

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Al-Mabsili date processing is blended with traditional and cultural practices throughout the history of Oman. Due to the modernization in the society, there is a decline in Al-Mabsili date production due to labor scarcity and youth migration to cities looking for other types of jobs. The aim of this research was to study the potentials for mechanization of date stripping process and to compare the ergonomic performance of mechanical options with the traditional method. A mechanical stripping machine prototype was developed with three power source options; bicycle, exercise machine and electric motor. First two needed two operators, peddler and feeder, while electric motor and traditional method needed one. Ergonomic performance tests were using the standard discomfort evaluation methods created at Cornell University. Tests were conducted on human physiological parameters, energy spent, Cornell evaluation of whole-body discomfort, hands discomfort and seat comfort. Standard NIOSH lifting evaluation was conducted considering the frequency of lifting date bunches by operators. The results showed that in all power sources, significant increase in heartbeat, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, oxygen consumption and body temperature with date stripping activity. The energy expenditure per kg was highest in traditional method with 14 kJ/kg, while bicycle and exercise machine had the higher energy expenditure rates of 25.7 and 24.3 kJ/min respectively. The Cornell whole-body postural discomfort evaluation showed the exercise machine with highest comfort level while the traditional method was the lowest. Neck and shoulders were the most affected areas in mechanical methods while hip, buttocks and lower back were most affected in traditional method. In Cornell hands discomfort evaluation, right hand was more affected than the left in all methods and first three fingers and the thumb were most affected. The Cornell seat comfort evaluation showed exercising machine is in m
机译:在阿曼的历史上,al-mabsili日期处理与传统和文化习俗混合。由于社会的现代化,由于劳动稀缺和青少年迁移到寻找其他类型的工作的城市,Al-Mabsili日期产量下降。该研究的目的是研究日期剥离过程的机械化的潜力,并与传统方法比较机械选择的人体工程学性能。用三种电源选项开发了机械剥离机原型;自行车,运动机和电动机。前两人需要两名操作员,扬限和饲养者,而电动机和传统方法需要一个。符合人体工程学的性能测试使用康奈尔大学创建的标准不适评估方法。测试是对人体生理参数,能量花费的,康奈尔评估全身不适,手不适和座椅舒适。考虑到运营商提升日期束的频率进行标准Niosh提升评估。结果表明,在所有电源中,心跳显着增加,收缩性和舒张压,氧气消耗和体温随着日期剥离活性。每公斤的能量支出在具有14 kJ / kg的传统方法中最高,而自行车和运动机器分别具有25.7和24.3 kJ / min的能源支出率较高。康奈尔全身的姿势不适评价显示了舒适程度最高的运动机器,而传统方法是最低的。颈部和肩部是机械方法中受影响最大的地区,而臀部,臀部和下背部最受影响的传统方法。在康奈尔手不适评估中,右手比左侧的所有方法和前三名手指和拇指都受到最大影响。康奈尔座椅舒适评价显示锻炼机器

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号