【24h】

The Advocacy Subjects of Third-party Logistics Contract Void

机译:第三方物流合同空白的宣传主题

获取原文

摘要

Who shall put forward or propose the third-party logistics contract void, about which the three Contract Laws issued have no provisions, this shows it is a legislative gap or knotty problem. This document aims to draw a conclusion that in China one party with logistics contract benefit loss shall put forward the third-party logistics contract void through analysis according to foreign legal provisions and legal basis; After disputing party's lawsuit, the court can review the third-party logistics contract ex officio and confirm the third-party logistics contract invalid, without the restrictions whether the disputing party puts forward third-party logistics contract void, so the court can be regarded as the proposer of third-party logistics contract void.
机译:谁将提出或提出第三方物流合同空白,索取的三项合同法没有任何规定,这表明它是一个立法差距或狭窄问题。 本文件旨在得出结论,在中国一方,物流合同效益损失应当根据外国法律规定和法律依据进行分析提出第三方物流合约空白; 在争议党的诉讼后,法院可以审查第三方物流合同前职权,并确认第三方物流合同无效,无论争议方是否提出第三方物流合约空白,所以法院可以被视为 第三方物流合约空白的提议者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号