首页> 外文会议>International Topical Meeting on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Analysis >IDENTIFYING KEY FACTORs AFFECTING A TEAM DECISION-MAKING TASK BASED ON THE ANALYSIS OF INVESTIGATING REPORTS ISSUED FROM DIVERSE INDUSTRIES
【24h】

IDENTIFYING KEY FACTORs AFFECTING A TEAM DECISION-MAKING TASK BASED ON THE ANALYSIS OF INVESTIGATING REPORTS ISSUED FROM DIVERSE INDUSTRIES

机译:确定基于各种行业签发的调查报告的分析,确定影响团队决策任务的关键因素

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

After the Fukushima accident, the scope of humanreliability analyses (HRAs) enlarged from the support ofLevel 1 PSA concerning the contribution of humanoperators in terms of preventing core damage to thesupporting of Level 2 PSA, which focuses on the role ofhuman operators mitigating the consequence of coredamage. The change of such scope means that an HRAmethod that allows us to quantify the human errorprobabilities (HEPs) of human failure events included insevere accident management guidelines is necessary (i.e.,Level 2 HRA). However, it is highly questionable thatexisting HRA methods are directly applicable to Level 2HRA, especially the quantification of HEPs related todecision-making tasks under severe accident conditions.For this reason, the authors proposed 34 factors that areclosely related to the performance of a team decisionmakingmaking task was proposed from the intensivereview of existing literature. In this paper, the catalog ofkey factors were identified from the analysis ofinvestigation reports issued from diverse industriesincluding the nuclear industry, railway systems, andaviation industry. Based on these key factors, variouskinds of event reports issued from diverse industries wereanalyzed. As a result, it is expected that a couple offactors that are significantly involved in the performanceof the decision-making tasks can be soundly picked out.From the development of a Level 2 HRA method, thecatalog of key factors plays an important role inestimating the HEP of a decision-making task beingincluded in SAMGs.
机译:在福岛事故之后,人类的范围可靠性分析(HRAS)扩大了支持关于人类贡献的1级PSA运营商在防止核心损坏方面支持2级PSA,这侧重于人类运营商减轻了核心的后果损害。这种范围的变化意味着HRA允许我们量化人为错误的方法包括在内的人体故障事件的概率(HEPS)需要严重的事故管理指南(即,2级HRA)。但是,它非常有值得怀疑现有的HRA方法直接适用于2级HRA,尤其是肝脏相关的量化在严重事故条件下决策任务。出于这个原因,提交人提出了34个因素与团队决策的表现密切相关制定任务是从密集的审查现有文献。在本文中,目录从分析中确定了关键因素各种产业发布的调查报告包括核工业,铁路系统和航空工业。基于这些关键因素,各种关键因素从各种行业发出的各种事件报告是分析。结果,预计几个显着参与性能的因素决策任务可以很好地挑选出来。从2级HRA方法的发展中,目录的关键因素在扮演中发挥着重要作用估计决策任务的律师事项包含在SAMG。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号