首页> 外文会议>ASME Pressure Vessels amp;amp;amp; Piping Conference >PATHWAY TO EVALUATE PRINTED CIRCUIT HEAT EXCHANGER BASED ON SIMPLIFIED ELASTIC-PERFECTLY PLASTIC ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY FOR HIGH TEMPERATURE NUCLEAR SERVICE
【24h】

PATHWAY TO EVALUATE PRINTED CIRCUIT HEAT EXCHANGER BASED ON SIMPLIFIED ELASTIC-PERFECTLY PLASTIC ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY FOR HIGH TEMPERATURE NUCLEAR SERVICE

机译:基于简化的高温核服务的简化弹性完美塑性分析方法评价印刷电路热交换器的途径

获取原文

摘要

Printed Circuit Heat Exchangers (PCHEs) are well-suited for Very High Temperature Reactors (VHTRs) due to high compactness and efficiency for heat transfer. The design of PCHE must be robust enough to withstand possible failure caused by cyclic loading during high temperature operation. The current rules in ASME Code Section III Division 5 to evaluate strain limits and creep-fatigue damage based on elastic analysis method have been deemed infeasible at temperatures above 650°C. Hence, these rules are inapplicable for temperatures ranging from 760-950°C for VHTRs. A full inelastic analysis method with complex constitutive material description as an alternative, on the other hand, is time consuming; hence impracticable. Therefore, the simplified Elastic-Perfectly Plastic (EPP) analysis methodology is used as a solution in ASME Code Section Ⅲ Division 5. The current literature, however, lacks any study on the performance evaluation of PCHE through EPP analysis. To address these issues, this study initiates the pathway of EPP evaluation of an actual size PCHE starting with elastic orthotropic analysis in the global scale. Subsequently, preliminary planning for analyzing intermediate and local submodels are provided to determine channel level responses to evaluate PCHE performance against strain limits and creep-fatigue damage using Code Case-N861 and N862 respectively. Printed circuit heat exchanger; ASME Code Section Ⅲ; simplified EPP methodology; global scale PCHE elastic orthotropic analysis; high temperature nuclear service
机译:由于热传递的高紧凑性和效率,印刷电路热交换器(PCHE)非常适合非常高的温度反应器(VHTRS)。 PCHE的设计必须足够坚固,以承受高温操作期间循环负载引起的可能失效。 ASME Code第III部分第III分部5的当前规则在650℃高于650℃的温度下被认为是不可行的。因此,这些规则可用于VHTR的760-950°C的温度不适用。另一方面,具有复杂本构体材料描述的全部非弹性分析方法,替代是耗时;因此不切实际。因此,简化的弹性完美塑料(EPP)分析方法用作ASME代码Ⅲ段的解决方案。然而,目前的文献缺乏通过EPP分析对PCHE的性能评估的研究。为了解决这些问题,本研究开始对全球范围内的弹性正向分析开始的实际尺寸PCHE的EPP评估的途径。随后,提供了分析中间体和局部子模型的初步规划,以确定使用代码案例-N861和N862评估对应变限制和蠕变 - 疲劳损坏的PCHE性能。印刷电路热交换器; ASME CODE第三节;简化的EPP方法;全球范围PCHE弹性正向熵分析;高温核服务

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号