首页> 外文会议>International Seminar on Education Research and Social Science >The Allocation Research about the Policy Functions and Economic Functions of China's Electricity Regulation
【24h】

The Allocation Research about the Policy Functions and Economic Functions of China's Electricity Regulation

机译:关于中国电力监管政策职能与经济职能的分配研究

获取原文

摘要

Macropolicy regulation and microeconomic regulation of electricity regulatory power are disparate types of powers in legal principles. The former has the property of quasi-legislative power but the latter has the property of both executive power and quasi-judicial power, which determine that it is supposed to allocate the above-mentioned different powers to different regulators according to the principle of checks and balance. After state electricity regulatory commission (sere) was established, the allocation structure that the administration is separated from supervising decentralized out of place when allocating the core economy regulatory power like electricity pricing to policy regulators, which didn't achieve the checks and balances; it radically abandons the allocation principles to repeal the current allocation structure of sere and allocate these two regulatory powers to the same regulator. Only relocating the policy and economy functions of electricity regulation in the light of independent regulation and energy regulation's patterns can it establish a basis to make china get rid of the trouble that the electricity regulation is invalid.
机译:电力调节和微观经济调节的电力监管能力是法律原则中的偏差类型。前者具有准立法权力的财产,但后者具有行政权力和准司法权的性质,这决定应根据支票原则将上述不同的权力分配给不同的监管机构。平衡。在建立国家电力监管委员会(Sere)后,当将核心经济监管权力分配给政策监管机构的核心经济监管权时,当局的分配结构与监督分散不合适的地方。它从根本上放弃了分配原则,以废除当前的Sere分配结构,并向同一监管机构分配这两个监管权力。只迁移电力监管的政策和经济职能,鉴于独立的监管和能源调节模式,它可以建立一个使中国摆脱电力监管无效的麻烦的基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号