【24h】

Media Regulation: Why, How and to What End?

机译:媒体规则:为什么,如何以及如何结束?

获取原文

摘要

In a democracy the significance of the media as a primary information source cannot be over accentuated, but it cannot be denied on the fact that democracy requires citizens to be informed for an effective administration and governance within the ambit of egalitarianism. Undoubtedly, commercial and technology progress are continuously changing our perception, still both print and digital media play a vital role in opinion building. The administration and regulatory mechanisms are sort of adopted at various levels to improve the role of media, however the focal thrust of this paper is based on how the regulatory mechanisms are not adequate therefore again and again being refined and reformed. In essence, it is argued in this article that the rationales for regulation (why regulate?) and the objectives of regulation (with what end in mind?) have been insufficiently addressed. Hence, the sophisticated regulatory mechanisms are failed to sustain the clear goals of the mass media across the globe. With this in mind, it is both inevitable and proper that the focus of this study of media regulation is confined to a pre-eminently comparative analysis of media regulations across the world.
机译:在一个民主国家的媒体作为主要的信息来源的重要性不能被过度强调,但它不能对民主要求公民对平均主义的范围内有效管理和治理被告知的事实被拒绝。毫无疑问,商业化和技术进步不断改变着我们的感知,还是印刷和数字媒体在舆论建设至关重要的作用。管理和调节机制有几分各级采取提高新闻媒体的作用,但本文的焦点推力是基于调控机制如何,因此没有足够的连连正在完善和改革。从本质上说,它在这篇文章中进行调节的理由(为什么调整?)和目标调控(在考虑什么目的呢?)没有得到充分讨论中争论。因此,复杂的调节机制未能维持世界各地的大众媒体的明确目标。考虑到这一点,它既是不可避免的,正确的,这项研究的媒体监管的重点仅限于跨世界媒体的规定预先突出地比较分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号