首页> 外文会议>SPE Russian Petroleum Technology Conference >Integration of Petrophysical Log Data with Computational Intelligence forthe Development of a Lithology Predictor
【24h】

Integration of Petrophysical Log Data with Computational Intelligence forthe Development of a Lithology Predictor

机译:将岩石物理测井数据与计算智能相结合,开发岩性预测仪

获取原文

摘要

Wrong manual interpretation from the log data about the formation type and other important information canbe catastrophic for the company-operator.With Machine-Learning(ML)(a branch of Artificial Intelligence)algorithms,the interpretation of formation type from the log data has been addressed.As a result,we havesuccessfully developed a program able to accurately predict the type of formation.Using the conventional Machine Learning technique of splitting the data into training,validation andtest sets,we tried six different ML algorithms to fit with the training part of the data and then verifytheir prediction accuracy with cross-validation scores and cross-validation predictions which tests theperformance of the classifiers(ML algorithms)on the validation set.The three best performing classifierswere selected and further improved by a search of classifier's best hyperparameters.These improvedclassifiers are further tested on unseen data to produce a comparative analysis.Our prediction accuracy with Receiver Operating Characteristic(ROC)scores and ROC-Area Under-the-Curve(ROC-AUC)for each type of formation from the log data lies in the range of 95-99%,exceptfor formations such as shaly sandstone and shale(50% and 84% respectively).The reason for this seemedto be under-fitting i.e.,during the training,the classifiers did not see enough instances of these types offormation to know exactly what characteristics of the data make the type of formation to be shaly sandstoneor shale.The issue of under-fitting was verified by skimming through the data.To resolve this problem,we suggest training classifiers with a larger data with more targets(types of formation).Furthermore,during the data cleaning(prior to classifier training)and data analysis phases we have discovered importantrelationships between well logs and defined relative importance of each well log for different formations.This observation can be investigated further to help eliminate the use of multiple well logs while dealing withsome formations(based on prior geological knowledge)and reduce the cost of the well logging operations.Using our program with a larger well log data consisting of more formation type instances,we can train theclassifiers to accurately predict the formation type irrespectively of differences in formation type.Our program is dynamic in the sense that with different targets,i.e.,type of formation fluid instead oftype of formation or both together,it can successfully predict either or both targets.Increasing the numbers of data instances resulted in a better training and thus,more accurate predictions.Utilization of the programwill make the formation-evaluation process easier,faster,automated and more-precise.
机译:从有关地层类型和其他重要信息的测井数据中进行错误的人工解释可能会给公司运营商带来灾难性的后果。通过机器学习(ML)(人工智能的一个分支)算法,可以从测井数据中解释地层类型。因此,我们成功地开发了一个能够准确预测地层类型的程序。使用传统的机器学习技术,将数据分为训练集、验证集和测试集,我们尝试了六种不同的ML算法来适应数据的训练部分,然后用交叉验证分数和交叉验证预测来验证它们的预测精度,这些预测在验证集上测试分类器(ML算法)的性能。选择了三个性能最好的分类器,并通过搜索分类器的最佳超参数进一步改进。这些改进的分类器将在看不见的数据上进一步测试,以进行比较分析。根据测井数据,我们对每种类型地层的接收器操作特征(ROC)分数和曲线下ROC面积(ROC-AUC)的预测精度在95-99%之间,但泥质砂岩和页岩等地层除外(分别为50%和84%)。其原因似乎不太合适,也就是说,在培训期间,分类器没有看到足够多的此类地层实例,因此无法确切了解数据的哪些特征使地层类型为泥质砂岩或泥质页岩。通过浏览数据验证了拟合不足的问题。为了解决这个问题,我们建议使用更大的数据和更多的目标(编队类型)来训练分类器。此外,在数据清理(分类器训练之前)和数据分析阶段,我们发现了测井曲线之间的重要关系,并定义了不同地层中每个测井曲线的相对重要性。可以进一步调查这一观察结果,以帮助消除在处理某些地层时使用多个测井曲线(基于先前的地质知识),并降低测井作业的成本。使用我们的程序处理由更多地层类型实例组成的更大的测井数据,我们可以训练分类人员准确预测地层类型,而不考虑地层类型的差异。我们的程序是动态的,因为对于不同的目标,即地层流体类型而不是地层类型或两者结合,它可以成功预测其中一个或两个目标。增加数据实例的数量可以得到更好的训练,从而得到更准确的预测。利用该程序将使编队评估过程更容易、更快、自动化和更精确。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号