首页> 外文会议>SPE Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Annual Technical Symposium and Exhibition >Screening of Surfactants and Polymers for High Temperature High Salinity Carbonate Reservoirs
【24h】

Screening of Surfactants and Polymers for High Temperature High Salinity Carbonate Reservoirs

机译:高温高盐度碳酸盐储层表面活性剂和聚合物的筛选

获取原文

摘要

Carbonate reservoirs typically exhibit significant heterogeneity, high temperature and high salinit ies. Surfactant and polymer selection for such reservoirs is a challenging process where extensive laboratory investigations are required to reach optimum concentration and formulation. In this work, we have evaluated a number of anionic, cationic, nonionic, and amphoteric surfactants (total 28 surfactants) and four different polymers for high temperature and high salinity carbonate reservoirs. Surfactants used were mainly: alkyl sulfonate, olefin sulfonate, alcohol ethoxylate, carboxyl betaine, ethoxylated fluorocarbon, amine oxide-based fluorocarbon, carboxy betaine, propoxylated alcohol, linear alcohol ethoxylate, and alkyl benzene sulfonate. Surfactants were evaluated using a series of evaluation steps which include but are not limited to evaluation of compatibility, phase behavior, interfacial tension, adsorption, rheology, and core-scale performance. Almost all anionic and cationic surfactants were either incompatible or thermally unstable. None of the anionic surfactants (sulfate, alcohol propoxylate and ethoxylate, phosphate and sulfonate), provided by various companies were thermally stable at harsh reservoir conditions. Most of the surfactants from amphoteric and nonionic classes were thermally stable and compatible at harsh reservoir conditions. Fluorinated amphoteric surfactants showed very good thermal stability at 90oC but their IFT was relative ly high (>1 mN/m). Similarly, fluorinated non-ionic surfactants showed good thermal stability but relative ly high IFT (>1 mN/m). Hydrocarbon surfactants were compatible, thermally stable and showed lower IFT values (10-2 mN/m). For core flooding experiments, fluorinated amphoteric surfactants and hydrocarbon surfactants were selected. Although fluorinated amphoteric surfactants showed relatively high IFT, they were selected due to good thermal stability, lower adsorption and synergistic viscosity enhancement with the selected polymers. The extensive screening of surfactants and polymers for high temperature and high salinity carbonate reservoirs improved our understanding of chemical selection for such conditions. This study could be used as a guideline in future research for selection of surfactants and polymers. .
机译:碳酸盐储层通常表现出显着的异质性,高温和高盐酸IE。对于这种储存器的表面活性剂和聚合物选择是一个具有挑战性的过程,其中需要广泛的实验室调查来达到最佳浓度和制剂。在这项工作中,我们已经评估了许多阴离子,阳离子,非离子和两性表面活性剂(总28个表面活性剂)和四种不同的聚合物,用于高温和高盐度碳酸盐储存器。所用的表面活性剂主要是:烷基磺酸盐,磺酸盐,醇乙氧基化物,羧基甜菜碱,乙氧基化氟碳化合物,氧化胺基氟碳化合物,羧基甜菜碱,丙氧基化醇,线性醇乙氧基化物和烷基苯磺酸盐。使用一系列评估步骤评估表面活性剂,其包括但不限于评估相容性,相行为,界面张力,吸附,流变学和核心级性能。几乎所有阴离子和阳离子表面活性剂都是不相容的或热不稳定的。由各种公司提供的阴离子表面活性剂(硫酸盐,吡酸苯甲酸盐和乙氧基化物,磷酸盐和磺酸盐)无在苛刻的储层条件下热稳定。来自两性和非离子类别的大多数表面活性剂在恶劣的储层条件下热稳定和兼容。氟化两性表面活性剂在90℃下显示出非常好的热稳定性,但它们的IFT相对Ly高(> 1mN / m)。类似地,氟化的非离子表面活性剂显示出良好的热稳定性,但相对Ly高IFT(> 1mN / m)。烃表面活性剂相容,热稳定,显示出较低的IFT值(10-2mN / m)。对于核心泛滥实验,选择氟化两性表面活性剂和烃表面活性剂。虽然氟化两性表面活性剂显示出相对高的IFT,但由于良好的热稳定性,较低的吸附和与所选聚合物增强的增强粘度增强而选择它们。表面活性剂和高盐度碳酸盐储层的表面活性剂和聚合物的广泛筛选改善了我们对这种病症的化学选择的理解。本研究可作为选择表面活性剂和聚合物的未来研究的指导。 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号