【24h】

Modelling and Optimizing Inflow Control Devices

机译:建模和优化流入控制装置

获取原文

摘要

Passive inflow control devices (ICDs) can redistribute the fluid influx (rate per unit length) into the well completion by causing additional pressure drops between the sand face and tubing. The aim of ICDs is to provide an increase in oil recovery and/or net present value (NPV) by reducing unwanted fluids. Software tools exist to model all aspects of ICD, reservoir, well and surface facilities. The challenge addressed by this paper is to provide an understanding of the implications for optimal ICD design over the life of the field, by integrating these models in a consistent manner. This paper investigates different aspects of detailed ICD design on horizontal producers, using a well- centric reservoir model. The ICD designs from the well-centric models were then applied to a full field reservoir model and integrated studies were then completed. This was achieved by linking several existing software to study the interaction between the ICD design, full field reservoir, well and surface network. Various aspects of the integration of these models were simulated including: artificial lift, water injection strategy and surface network. Predictably, well-centric simulations showed that ICD designs are dependent on the objective function that is being maximized. If NPV is to be optimized, designing ICD strength to have higher production from the heel and toe regions of the well may produce better results than attempting to equalize the inflow for the entire well. Integrated studies showed that artificial lift can be beneficial in combination with ICDs, as the ICDs redistributed the fluid influx into the well, yet the liquid rate reduction due to the additional pressure drop from the ICDs was mitigated. Even when ICDs were shown to be beneficial on standalone reservoir/well models, the design and predicted benefit when a surface network is coupled depends on: how the surface network is operated, surface network constraints and the relative water cut of the well which ICDs are applied to in comparison to the other wells in the field. These results show that ICD design and optimization requires an integrated approach to ensure outcomes that are consistent with the reality of the field.
机译:无源流入控制装置(ICDS)可以通过在砂面和管道之间的额外压降下降来重新分配流体流入(每单位长度的速率)进入井完成。 ICDS的目的是通过减少不需要的流体来提供溢油和/或净目的值(NPV)的增加。存在软件工具,以绘制ICD,水库,井和表面设施的所有方面。本文解决的挑战是通过以一致的方式集成这些模型来了解对现场寿命的最佳ICD设计的影响。本文研究了使用良好的水库模型对水平生产商进行了详细的ICD设计的不同方面。然后将来自中心模型的ICD设计应用于完整的储层模型,然后完成综合研究。这是通过将若干现有软件联系起来研究ICD设计,全场储层,井和表面网络之间的互动。模拟这些模型集成的各个方面包括:人工升力,注水策略和表面网络。可预见的是,以良好为中心的模拟表明ICD设计取决于最大化的目标函数。如果要优化NPV,则设计ICD强度从井的脚跟和脚趾区域产生更高的生产可能会产生更好的结果,而不是试图均衡整个井的流入。综合研究表明,人工升降可以与ICD组合有益,因为ICD将流体流入井重新分布到井中,但减轻了来自ICD的额外压降引起的液速降低。即使在ICDS在独立水库/井模型上有益,当耦合耦合时的设计和预测的益处取决于:如何运行表面网络,表面网络约束和ICD的井的相对水切割与该领域的其他井相比相比。这些结果表明,ICD设计和优化需要一种综合方法,以确保与现实现实一致的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号