【24h】

Dynamic load balanced routing in IP networks

机译:IP网络中的动态负载平衡路由

获取原文

摘要

In this paper, we address the dynamic load balanced routing problem in IP networks. In current IP networks, shortest paths are selected for routing based on static link weight metrics. Due to the lack of stringent synchronization among routers, dynamically changing link weight would generate transient loops. How to perform dynamic load balanced routing without generating traffic loops become a challenging task. In this work, we propose two approaches, Local Traffic Rerouting (LTR) and Global Traffic Rerouting (GTR), to resolve the problem. Both approaches use a set of static link weight metrics. Each router obtains the metrics through standard link state routing protocol. Based on the link metrics, in each router, a directed acyclic graph (DAG) for each destination node is derived. Taking the advantage of the property that there is no loop in a DAG, each router can make its decision to dynamically select next hop node for routing. The major difference between LTR and GTR is that the former uses only local information while the latter uses global information on routing decision. In LTR, each router monitors its links to obtain the bandwidth utilization. In GTR, the local link utilization information is broadcast to the whole network through routing protocol so each node in the network knows the state of the whole network. We have conducted simulations and experiments to make performance comparisons among various routing approaches. The results indicate that LTR and GTR significantly outperform conventional static routing on minimizing link utilization of the most congested link. They also have performance close to a per flow based centralized controlled routing that is served for a lower bound for performance evaluations.
机译:在本文中,我们要解决平衡在IP网络路由问题的动态负载。在当前的IP网络中,最短路径被选择用于基于静态链路权重度量的路由。由于路由器之间缺乏严格同步,动态变化的链接权重会产生短暂的回路。如何进行平衡的动态负载,而不会产生交通圈成为一项艰巨的任务路由。在这项工作中,我们提出了两种方法,本地流量重新路由(LTR)和广域网流量重路由(GTR),以解决该问题。这两种方法都使用一组静态链接权重指标。每个路由器获得通过标准链路状态路由协议的指标。基于该链路量度,在每个路由器中,有向非循环图(DAG),用于每个目的地节点的。以有DAG中没有环路的财产的优势,每个路由器可以做出决定,以动态地选择下一跳节点的路由。 LTR和GTR的主要区别在于,前者只使用本地信息而后者使用的路由决定全局信息。在LTR中,每个路由器监视其链路,以获得带宽利用率。在GTR,本地链路利用信息通过这样的网络中的每个节点都知道整个网络的状态路由协议广播至整个网络。我们已经进行了仿真和实验,使各种路由方法之间的性能对比。结果表明,LTR和GTR显著优于传统的静态最小化最拥塞链路的链路利用率路由。他们也有性能接近基于集中式控制路由已投放的下界绩效评估每个流。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号