首页> 外文会议>International workshop on dryland agriculture and ecosystem sustainability >Density-dependent plant type plasticity and adaptation strategy in two Avena sativa cultivars
【24h】

Density-dependent plant type plasticity and adaptation strategy in two Avena sativa cultivars

机译:两种Avena Sativa品种的密度依赖植物型可塑性和适应策略

获取原文

摘要

Integrated studies on plant type plasticity and adaptation strategy in cultivated plants are critical for both crop breeding and field management.A controlled greenhouse experiment was conducted to test a hypothesis that different leaf types of oat have different strategies to adapt density stresses.Two oat genotypes, 'Manotick' with erect leaf architecture, and 'Oa1316-1' with prostrate leaf,were grown in four planting densities in a factorial experimental design with 4 replicates.Density was adjusted by varying the number of seeds planted in each container (cone) and the space between containers, thus creating either aboveground competition only or both roots and aboveground competition situations.Our data showed that yield, leaf area, chlorophyll content, plant height and stem diameter of both genotypes decreased significantly with increasing plant density.Biomass allocation to aboveground organs decreased while the allocation to underground organs increased with increasing plant density.Under high density stress (8 and 16 plants per container) conditions,compared to solid treatment, Manotick allocated 3-10% more biomass to the root system,produced 50% more tillers, leading to higher number of non-productive tillers, and resulted in lower harvest index under the alternative arrangement.In contrast, the prostrate type Oa1 316-1 allocated proportionally more biomass to the panicles and stems, and less to the root system.Consequently,there were fewer tillers in Oa1361-1.Our data indicates that yield differences between the two types of oats resulted from diverse life history strategies.With increasing plant density and strengthening plant-to-plant competition, Manotick reduced aboveground biomass allocation, which led to lower yield, while Oa1 316-1 decreased biomass allocation to the roots, but increased biomass allocation to the stems and panicles under increasingly competitive environment.These adjustments in prostrate type genotypes maintained high and strong stems, ensured biomass allocation to reproductive components and achieved high final yield.
机译:在栽培植物的植物型可塑性和适应战略的整合研究是进行了测试一个假设,即不同类型的叶燕麦有不同的策略,以适应密度stresses.Two燕麦基因型两种作物育种和现场management.A控制温室试验的关键, “Manotick”有直立叶片架构,和“Oa1316-1”与匍匐叶,四个种植密度培养在析因实验设计用4 replicates.Density通过改变种植在每个容器(锥)的种子数量和调整容器之间的空间,从而只产生任一地上竞争或根和地上竞争situations.Our数据表明,产量,叶面积,叶绿素含量,株高和茎两种基因型的直径随着植物density.Biomass分配到地上显著降低器官下降,而分配到地下器官随工厂去增加nsity.Under高密度胁迫条件(每个容器8个16株植物)相比,固体处理,Manotick分配更多3-10%的生物质到根系统,产生更多的50%的分蘖,从而导致更高的数非生产性分蘖,并导致下替代arrangement.In对比度低的收获指数,匍匐型OA1 316-1按比例分配更多的生物量的穗和茎,及少到根system.Consequently,有在Oa1361-1.Our分蘖少数据表明,两种类型的燕麦之间产量差异导致来自不同生活史strategies.With增加植物密度和加强电厂至植物的竞争,降低Manotick地上生物量的分配,这导致较低的产率,而OA1 316-1降低生物质分配给根,但增加的生物量分配到茎和下竞争日益激烈environment.These调整穗在匍匐型基因型维持高和强ST EMS,确保的生物量分配到生殖部件,取得高的最终产率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号