首页> 外文会议>IIR International Conference on Sustainability and the Cold Chain >COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT REFRIGERANTS FOR A TWO-STAGE TRANSPORT REFRIGERATION SYSTEM
【24h】

COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT REFRIGERANTS FOR A TWO-STAGE TRANSPORT REFRIGERATION SYSTEM

机译:两阶段运输制冷系统不同制冷剂的比较

获取原文

摘要

The single-stage vapour compression cycle with the synthetic refrigerants R-404A and R-410A is state of the art in transport refrigeration. Both named refrigerants have a high Global Warming Potential (GWP). Current research activities focus, amongst others, on new energy efficient vapour compression cycles and the application of low GWP-refrigerants. A two-stage vapour compression cycle with an internal heat exchanger at intermediate pressure is a widely used inter-stage system at low and medium evaporating temperatures in commercial refrigeration. Such a cycle leads to a considerable increase of the system's energy efficiency compared to a single-stage unit, especially for the refrigerant R-744 in combination with low temperature applications. Due to its thermodynamic properties, the natural refrigerant R-744 with GWP100=1 might be an eco-friendly and competitive alternative to the commonly used synthetic high-GWP-refrigerants R-404A and R-410A. In this paper, a numerical comparison of a R-410A and a R-744 two-stage vapour compression cycle with an internal heat exchanger at intermediate pressure for transport refrigeration is presented. The object oriented modelling language Modelica and the component library TIL are used to model the refrigerant cycle. This model is validated against previously published experimental data of a R-744 two-stage test unit for commercial transport refrigeration. Thermo-physical effects such as pressure drop and heat transfer in the different components of the refrigeration cycle are considered in the model by general correlations. The applied model predicts the measured cooling capacities and the Coefficients of Performance (COP) within an uncertainty of 4 and 8%, respectively. A simulative comparison of the R-410A and the R-744 two-stage vapour compression cycle is presented and discussed for two different applications: The COP of both refrigerants is compared for a constant cooling capacity of 15kW and varying ambient temperature. The average energy consumption per year of a transport refrigeration system in Germany, Spain and the USA is estimated for both refrigerants.
机译:具有合成制冷剂R-404a和R-410a的单级蒸汽压缩循环是运输制冷中的最先进的。两家名称制冷剂都具有高全球变暖潜力(GWP)。目前的研究活动在新的节能蒸汽压缩循环和低GWP制冷剂的应用中,重点放在诸如新的节能蒸汽压缩循环中。在中间压力下具有内部热交换器的两级蒸汽压缩循环是在商业制冷中的低和中等蒸发温度下广泛使用的间级系统。与单级单元相比,这种循环导致系统的能量效率相当大,特别适用于制冷剂R-744与低温应用组合。由于其热力学性质,具有GWP100 = 1的天然制冷剂R-744可能是常用的合成高GWP制冷剂R-404A和R-410A的环保和竞争替代品。本文介绍了R-410a的数值比较和R-744两级蒸汽压缩循环,其在用于运输制冷的中间压力下的内部热交换器。面向对象的建模语言模型和组件库TIL用于建模制冷剂循环。该模型针对先前公布的用于商业运输制冷的R-744两级试验单元的实验数据进行了验证。通过一般相关性在模型中考虑在制冷循环的不同部件中的压降和传热等热物理效应。所应用的模型可以分别预测测量的冷却容量和性能(COP)的变量分别在4和8%的不确定性内。对于两个不同的应用,提出和讨论了R-410A和R-744两级蒸汽压缩循环的模拟比较:将两个制冷剂的COP进行比较,以恒定的冷却能力为15kW和不同的环境温度。德国,西班牙和美国的每年运输制冷系统的平均能耗估计为两个制冷剂。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号