首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Integrated Water Resources Management Karlsruhe >Water Pricing Allocation: Water 'as Economic-Social Good'
【24h】

Water Pricing Allocation: Water 'as Economic-Social Good'

机译:水定价与分配:水“作为经济 - 社会良好”

获取原文

摘要

The use of regular economic theories for water pricing and allocation found to be inappropriate and ineffective. The argument of "Water as an Economic Good" relies on the unique characteristics that give a special classification and economical and social consideration for water to be an Economic-Social Good (Common-Pool Resource). The diversity between water user sectors has different excludability and sub-tractability that ends with different kinds of economic value of water; as public or private good. The character of water does not tolerate with market theory in water allocation between sub-sectors and different water using categories, and as a result, calls for careful allocation of the resource so that its economic value is realized and social benefits are maximized. Several allocation mechanisms are used to consider water as an economic good; marginal cost pricing, allocation by a social planning (public allocation) and allocation by market forces. Economists often call for implementing water markets, which is thought to be an effective instrument to improve water allocation particularly in water scarce situation. On the other hand, non-economists treat water as a basic human need that should be largely expanded from competitive market pricing and allocation. Uncertainty can be reduced and the process of choosing the most beneficial project and policy can be optimized. Pricing definitely means to secure a resource value, Water pricing is recognized to have the potential to mitigate water scarcity to a certain extent. It can provide incentives to water conservation and transfer from low-value to high-value agricultural production. It does not automatically imply that a market price needs to be paid to make the allocation efficient. Water is too bulky (too costly in relation to its price). Increasing block and rate a tariff appears to provide an effective tariff structure to achieve the objective of cost recovery and to maintain the equity of the society. Although tariffs have not been designed, operate and managed well in most developing countries, where a general pricing policy is an increasing-block tariff with a reduced-rate initial block corresponding to basic needs.
机译:使用定期经济理论进行水价和分配,发现不恰当和无效。 “作为经济良好的水”的论点依赖于独特的特征,为水提供特殊分类和经济和社会考虑,成为经济社会社会良好(共同池资源)。水电站用户部门之间的多样性具有不同的无排他性和脱疏性,以不同种类的水资源的经济价值结束;作为公共或私人的好处。水的性质不容适应于使用类别的子行业和不同水的水分配的市场理论,因此呼吁仔细配置资源,以实现其经济价值,社会效益最大化。几种分配机制用于考虑水作为经济良好;边缘成本定价,社会规划(公共配置)分配和市场力量的分配。经济学家经常要求实施水市场,这被认为是改善水分配的有效工具,特别是在水资源稀缺情况下。另一方面,非经济学家将水作为基本的人类需求,这应该在很大程度上从竞争性市场定价和分配中扩大。可以减少不确定性,可以优化选择最有益的项目和政策的过程。定价肯定是为了确保资源价值,识别出水价,以有可能在一定程度上减轻水资源稀缺性。它可以提供水资源保护和从低价转移到高价值农业生产的激励。它不会自动意味着需要支付市场价格以进行分配效率。水太笨重(与其价格的昂贵)。增加块和速率似乎提供了有效的关税结构,以实现成本恢复的目标,并保持社会的股权。虽然在大多数发展中国家没有设计,运营和管理的关税,但一般定价政策是一个增加的折扣关税,其降价初始块对应于基本需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号