首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Health, Safety and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production >A Study of Rollover Occupant Injury Mitigation Using Dynamic Testing To Evaluate Alternative Protection Systems
【24h】

A Study of Rollover Occupant Injury Mitigation Using Dynamic Testing To Evaluate Alternative Protection Systems

机译:使用动态测试来评估替代保护系统的滚动乘员损伤研究

获取原文

摘要

Since the onset of automotive safety awareness over 60 years ago the only rollover protection solution to be widely acknowledged and used in the E & P Industry has been the traditional internal roll cage. These traditional roll cages have become out-of-date and in recent testing are shown to be ineffective at the A-Pillar and windshield header. An all-encompassing study of rollover accidents has shown that this old technology is not the best way to mitigate injury. Understanding “Real World” rollover crashes and how injuries occur is instrumental in pinpointing the key areas of the vehicle’s roof structure that require improvement. Our study included over 500 “Real World” rollover crash investigations and over 300 rollover crash tests performed with innovative dynamic testing using the Jordan Rollover System (JRS). Over the past decade automobile manufacturers have improved roof strength and added computer controlled driver assistance measures to avoid crashes. Still, the need exists for a majority of the common SUV’s, Ute’s, Vans, and buses to use an aftermarket solution. This study illuminates the deficiencies in internal and other ROPS enabling HSE Managers to make more informed decisions when choosing a system. The goal of ROPS today should be to protect occupants without interfering with OEM safety systems. Our investigation shows that rollovers producing serious to fatal injuries are characterized by a vehicle crash that includes rolling with forward pitch. In this circumstance, injury occurs when; vehicles roof strength is low, the geometry of the vehicle is poor including a large major radius, the structure of the roof is open section and/or the windshield header is weak. These crash characteristics show the importance of reinforcement at the A-Pillar and forward roof header. Traditional roll cages do not protect this area of the vehicle as shown in the new testing included in this paper. The E & P Industry is spending millions of dollars annually on occupant protection systems that are not offering the best protection for their workforce. New technologies in current vehicles and research advances in the design and approach to protection systems can reduce overall costs without sacrificing protection.
机译:由于汽车安全意识是在60年前唯一的翻车保护解决方案发病到被广泛认可,并在勘探与生产行业使用的一直是传统的内部防滚架。这些传统的滚架已成为外的日期和在最近的测试被示出为在A柱和挡风玻璃头无效的。翻车事故的一个包罗万象的研究表明,这种老技术不是为了减轻伤害的最佳方式。了解“真实世界”倾翻事故以及如何发生的伤害是在查明需要改进车辆的车顶结构的关键领域的工具。超过500个包括我们的学习“真实世界”翻滚碰撞的调查和超过300翻滚碰撞测试,以创新的动态执行使用乔丹侧翻系统(JRS)测试。在过去十年的汽车制造商必须提高车顶强度和增加计算机控制驾驶辅助措施,以避免崩溃。不过,需要有一个广大的普通SUV的,乌特的,货车和公共汽车使用的售后解决方案。这项研究阐明在内部和其他ROPS使HSE管理者做出更明智的决策选择系统时的不足之处。今天ROPS的目标应该是保护乘客不与OEM安全系统的干扰。我们的调查显示,翻车产生严重到致命的伤害是由包括用沥青向前滚动的车辆碰撞特点。在这种情况下,发生损伤的时候;车辆车顶强度是低的,在车辆的几何形状是差包括一个大型主半径,屋顶的结构是开放的部分和/或风挡头较弱。这些碰撞特性显示在A柱和前上边头加固的重要性。如图包含在本文的新的测试传统的防滚架不保护汽车的这个区域。在勘探与生产行业是在未提供其员工最好的保护乘员保护系统每年花费数百万美元。在设计和方法来保护系统当前的车辆和研究进展,新技术可以降低总体成本,而不会牺牲保护。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号