首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Computing Technology and Information Management >Evaluating Packet-level Forward Error Correction: 1-D interleaved parity codes
【24h】

Evaluating Packet-level Forward Error Correction: 1-D interleaved parity codes

机译:评估分组级前向纠错:1-D交错奇偶校验码

获取原文

摘要

Packet-Level Forward Error Correction (PL-FEC) techniques are widely applied to multimedia communications. To deal with the burst loss problem in packet transmissions over networks, PL-FEC 1-D interleaved parity codes are used in Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP), which uses User Datagram Protocol (UDP) to transport packets. However, the codes' error correction performance, encoding rate, decoding rate and throughput have not been comprehensively evaluated recently. Besides, the width of the interleaving window is not specified in corresponding RTP; unsuitable window width may result in damaging the codes' error correction performance. In this paper, the encoding and decoding algorithms were given, and the algorithms were implemented by programming 1-D interleaved parity codes' encoder and decoder on computers, which produced high encoding and decoding rates. Gilbert and Elliott (GE) model was used for simulating the losing packets behavior. In real experiments, UDP was used for the transport of a file of H.264 encoded by 1-D interleaved parity codes' encoder. By simulative and real experiments, the codes were evaluated; the suitable window width was suggested. The codes coding are simpler than other PL-FEC codes coding. Besides, a simple comparison of the codes and Reed-Solomon (RS) codes was done; for multimedia communications, the codes are better than RS codes.
机译:分组级前向纠错(PL-FEC)技术广泛应用于多媒体通信。为了在网络上处理数据包传输中的突发损失问题,PL-FEC 1-D交错奇偶校验码在实时传输协议(RTP)中使用,该协议使用用户数据报协议(UDP)传输分组。然而,尚未全面地评估代码的纠错性能,编码率,解码速率和吞吐量。此外,在相应的RTP中未指定交织窗口的宽度;不合适的窗口宽度可能导致损坏代码的纠错性能。在本文中,给出了编码和解码算法,并且通过在计算机上编程1-D交错奇偶校验码的编码器和解码器来实现算法,其产生高编码和解码速率。 Gilbert和Elliott(GE)模型用于模拟丢失的数据包行为。在真实实验中,UDP用于传输由1-D交错奇偶校验编码器编码的H.264的文件。通过模拟和实验实验,评估代码;建议了合适的窗口宽度。编码编码比其他PL-FEC代码编码更简单。此外,代码和芦苇所罗门(RS)代码的简单比较已经完成;对于多媒体通信,代码优于RS代码。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号