首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Engineering Materials, Energy, Management and Control >Comparison between Numerical Simulation and Analytical Calculation of Heat Loss and Temperature Profile of Buried Pipes
【24h】

Comparison between Numerical Simulation and Analytical Calculation of Heat Loss and Temperature Profile of Buried Pipes

机译:数值模拟与埋地管热损失和温度曲线分析计算的比较

获取原文

摘要

The fictitious thermal source (FTS) method has always been the popular analytical way to solve heat transfer of buried pipes. Aiming at complicated conditions, simplified model and procedure based on the FTS method often casts doubts upon the results. Therefore, a numerical simulation method with circle boundary condition is validated comparing to the accurate temperature profile of buried steel pipe without insulation calculated by the FTS method. Then, the simulation method is used to verify calculation error when solving insulated pipes by the FTS method. The comparison shows that it is difficult to obtain accurate temperature profile for buried insulated pipe by the FTS method. However, the average temperature and heat loss are more precise and can be used to solve complicated problems by the analytical method.
机译:虚拟热源(FTS)方法始终是解决埋地管热传递的流行分析方法。针对复杂的条件,基于FTS方法的简化模型和过程通常会对结果进行疑虑。因此,验证了具有圆形边界条件的数值模拟方法,比较了由FTS方法计算的埋藏钢管的精确温度曲线。然后,仿真方法用于通过FTS方法求解绝缘管时验证计算误差。比较表明,难以通过FTS方法获得掩埋绝缘管的精确温度曲线。然而,平均温度和热量损失更精确,可用于通过分析方法解决复杂的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号