首页> 外文会议>AIChE Annual Meetings >The Effect of Fly Ash from Different Coal Sources on the Reactivity of an Iron-based Oxygen Carrier for Chemical Looping Combustion
【24h】

The Effect of Fly Ash from Different Coal Sources on the Reactivity of an Iron-based Oxygen Carrier for Chemical Looping Combustion

机译:不同煤源的粉煤灰对化学环燃烧铁基氧载体反应性的影响

获取原文

摘要

The University of Kentucky, Center for Applied Energy Research is investigating oxygen carriers (OC) for chemical looping combustion (CLC) with the goal of developing a pressurized chemical looping combustion/gasification process for generating electricity from coal. An important issue in the application of CLC to a solid fuel is the effect of ash on the performance of the OC. A previous study using a bituminous coal ash obtained from an electric utility suggested that the ash. was not detrimental to the capacity and reactivity of two iron based OCs and iron, oxide already present in the ash may have contributed additional OC activity~1. With the wide variety of coals used to generate electricity worldwide, it is unlikely that all ashes will have the same effect on OCs. Recently four ashes obtained from bituminous, sub-bituminous, and lignite coals were used in a comparative study of their effect on the reactivity of an iron based OC to combust a high carbon beneficiated coal char under dry inert gas (argon) conditions in a TGA~2. As expected the ash effect on the OC varied with the different ashes. The lignite ash did not affect the performance of the OC up to the highest concentration (75%) tested. The Bulgarian subbituminous which had a Fe_2O_3 concentration of nearly 14% caused a 20% reduction in the performance of the OC which was contrary to anticipated results. The Powder River Basin (PRB) ash produced a slight reduction in carbon removal ability as did the China bituminous ash. However, the results for the China ash which had 8.5% residual carbon indicated that the OC at the right carbon to OC ratio could also combust the residual carbon in the ash as well as the carbon in the fuel char. This study was undertaken to further investigate the impact on an iron based OC of these four different fly ashes in the presence of water vapor (WV) consistent with conditions which would exist during CLC in comparison to dry gas results.
机译:肯塔基州大学,应用能源研究中心正在研究用于化学循环燃烧(CLC)的氧气载体(OC),其目的是开发加压化学环形燃烧/气化过程,用于从煤炭产生电力。 CLC应用于固体燃料的一个重要问题是灰烬对OC的性能的影响。先前使用从电动用途获得的烟灰灰的研究表明灰烬。对两种铸铁的OC和铁的容量和反应性并不有害,已经存在于灰中的氧化物可能有助于另外的OC活性〜1。随着各种各样的煤炭用于全球发电,所有灰烬都不太可能对OCS产生相同的效果。最近,从沥青,亚沥青和褐煤煤中获得的四个灰烬用于对其对TGA中干惰性气体(氩气)燃烧高碳受益煤炭燃烧的高碳受益煤炭的影响的比较研究〜2。正如预期的那样,对OC的灰烬效果随着不同的灰烬而变化。褐煤灰不影响OC的性能,最高浓度(75%)测试。保加利亚亚脱脂的Fe_2O_3浓度近14%,oc的性能降低了20%,这与预期的结果相反。粉末河流盆(PRB)灰分在碳去除能力略有降低,如中国烟灰。然而,含有8.5%残留碳的中国灰分的结果表明,右碳对OC比的OC也可以燃烧灰烬中的残留碳以及燃料炭中的碳。本研究进一步研究了在与干气体结果相比,水蒸气(WV)存在下,在水蒸气(WV)的情况下,进一步研究对这四种不同飞煤的铸铁的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号