首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Environmental, Biomedical and Biotechnology >Assessing the threshold temperatures among different age and causeof-deaths
【24h】

Assessing the threshold temperatures among different age and causeof-deaths

机译:评估不同年龄的阈值温度和死亡死亡

获取原文

摘要

The relationship between temperature and mortality is non-linear and the effect estimates depend on the threshold temperatures selected. However, little is known about whether threshold temperatures differ with age or cause of deaths in the Southern Hemisphere. We conducted polynomial distributed lag non-linear models to assess the threshold temperatures for mortality from all ages (Dall), aged from 15 to 64 (D15-64), 65- 84(D65-84), ≥85 years (D85+), respiratory (RD) and cardiovascular diseases (CVD) in Brisbane, Australia, 1996–2004. We examined both hot and cold thresholds, and the lags of up to 15 days for cold effects and 3 days for hot effects. Results show that for the current day, the cold threshold was 20°C and the hot threshold was 28°C for the groups of Dall, D15-64 and D85+. The cold threshold was higher (23°C) for the group of D65-84 and lower (21°C) for the group of CVD. The hot threshold was higher (29°C) for the group of D65-84 and lower (27°C) for the group of RD. Compared to the current day, for the cold effects of up to 15-day lags, the threshold was lower for the group of D15-64, and the thresholds were higher for the groups of D65-84, D85+, RD and CVD; while for the hot effects of 3-day lags, the threshold was higher for the group of D15-64 and the thresholds were lower for the groups of D65-84 and RD. Temperature thresholds appeared to differ with age and death categories. The elderly and deaths from RD and CVD were more sensitive to temperature stress than the adult group. These findings may have implications in the assessment of temperature-related mortality and development of weather/health warning systems.
机译:温度和死亡率之间的关系是非线性的,并且效果估计取决于所选择的阈值温度。然而,关于阈值温度是否随着年龄或南半球死亡的成因而众所周知。我们进行多项式分布式滞后非线性模型,以评估来自所有年龄(DALL)的死亡率的阈值温度,从15至64(D15-64),65-84(D65-84),≥85岁(D85 +), Brisbane,澳大利亚,1996-2004的呼吸(RD)和心血管疾病(CVD)。我们检查了炎热和冷阈值,滞后15天,冷效应为3天,热效应。结果表明,对于当前,冷阈值为20°C,热阈值为28°C,对于Dall,D15-64和D85 +组。对于CVD组的D65-84组和低(21℃),冷阈值较高(23℃)。对于RD组的D65-84组和低(27℃),热阈值较高(29℃)。与目前的一天相比,对于最多15天的滞后的冷效应,D15-64组的阈值较低,阈值较高,适用于D65-84,D85 +,RD和CVD的组;虽然对于3天滞后的热效果,但对于D15-64的组,阈值较高,而D65-84和Rd的组阈值较低。温度阈值似乎与年龄和死亡类别不同。来自RD和CVD的老年人和死亡比成年组更敏感。这些发现可能对温度相关死亡率和天气/健康警告系统的发展有影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号