【24h】

Comparison of Retrofitting Techniques for Existing Steel Moment Resisting Frames

机译:现有钢力矩抵抗框架改造技术的比较

获取原文

摘要

Seismic protection of critical facilities such as hospitals, emergency response centers, and schools is crucial as these buildings must remain in full service after major earthquakes. A new modular, multiple-panel infill system made of a ductile, high performance fiber reinforced concrete (HPFRC) is currently under investigation with a focus on protecting such critical facilities wherein the primary structural system is a steel, moment-resisting frame. The primary objective of this paper is to compare the proposed HPFRC infill panel retrofit system with the alternative retrofit techniques of buckling-restrained braces (BRBs) and viscous dampers for seismic protection of existing steel moment resisting frames. The effectiveness of the three seismic retrofit techniques is evaluated based on analytical simulations after retrofitting the SAC 3-story structure. It is shown that the HPFRC infill panel system when installed in an existing steel moment resisting frame designed prior to major earthquake events (Northridge, 1994, Kobe, 1995) limits residual story drifts as well as frame damage at a design and a maximum considered event. Its seismic response is very comparable with the state-of-the art BRB and viscous damper retrofitting techniques.
机译:由于这些建筑物在重大地震后必须在全面的服务中留在全部服务,因此诸如医院,应急中心和学校等关键设施的地震保护是至关重要的。目前正在研究一种新的模块化,高性能纤维增强混凝土(HPFRC)的多面板填充系统,其专注于保护这些关键设施,其中主要结构系统是钢,力矩抵抗框架。本文的主要目的是将所提出的HPFRC填充面板改造系统与屈曲抑制的胶带(BRB)和粘性阻尼器的替代改造技术进行了比较,用于现有钢力矩抵抗框架的地震保护。三层岩石结构后的分析模拟评估了三种地震改造技术的有效性。结果表明,HPFRC infill面板系统安装在现有的钢矩抵抗框架中,在主要地震事件(Northride,1994,Kobe,1995)中限制了残留的故事漂移以及设计的框架损坏以及最大的考虑事件。其地震反应与最先进的BRB和粘性阻尼器改装技术非常比较。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号