首页> 外文会议>China international conference in finance >Mandatory vs. contractual disclosure in securities markets: Evidence from the 1930s
【24h】

Mandatory vs. contractual disclosure in securities markets: Evidence from the 1930s

机译:强制性与合同披露证券市场:20世纪30年代的证据

获取原文

摘要

This paper studies the effect of initial mandatory disclosure documents filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Our sample companies are listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and subject to its disclosure requirements at the time of the regulatory filings. To establish a baseline, we first document that listed firms experience abnormal volatility and trading volumes around the time of earnings announcements. When listed companies later make their initial Exchange Act disclosures, however, there in no similar market reaction, suggesting that the additional legally mandated disclosures-principally having to do with management compensation and ownership structure-did not contain value-relevant information as to companies already subject to NYSE disclosure rules.
机译:本文研究了1934年“证券交易所”证券交流法案“提交的初始强制披露文件的影响。我们的示例公司列在纽约证券交易所(纽约证券交易所)上市,并在监管申请时借鉴其披露要求。 为了建立一个基线,我们首先将上市公司围绕盈利公告的时间经历异常波动和交易量。 然而,当上市公司后来进行初步交流法案披露,在没有类似的市场反应中,暗示额外的合法授权披露 - 主要与管理赔偿和所有权结构有关 - 没有包含公司的价值相关信息 受纽约证明披露规则。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号