首页> 外文会议>ICME International Conference on Complex Medical Engineering >Comparison of Natural and Artificial Filling Cystometry using a Newly Constructed Portable Urodynamics System
【24h】

Comparison of Natural and Artificial Filling Cystometry using a Newly Constructed Portable Urodynamics System

机译:使用新构造的便携式型缸系统的天然和人工填充胱术的比较

获取原文

摘要

A conventional voiding cystometry involves artificially filling the bladder with saline and reproduce their symptoms, while making precise measurements in order to identify their underlying causes. However, it is difficult to evaluate physiological functions during storage and voiding of the bladder. In this study, we constructed a portable cystometry device based on personal digital assistance (PDA) device and compared its clinical utilities while applying this device to both natural and artificial filling cystometry study. The range of errors of the pressure signals measured our constructed device was less than 1 cmH_2O, and the reproducibility of two pressure channels were 2.32±2.97 and 3.67±5.31%, respectively. Also, the clinical assessment of our device showed that the system has the capability to accurately monitor the types of information that contribute to the diagnosis and management of patients.
机译:常规的空隙囊体涉及用盐水人工填充膀胱并再现症状,同时进行精确测量以识别其潜在原因。然而,难以在储存期间评估生理功能和膀胱排出。在这项研究中,我们构建了基于个人数字辅助(PDA)装置的便携式囊型器械,并在将该装置应用于天然和人工填充胱型研究的同时进行临床公用事事件。所测量的压力信号的误差范围小于1cmH_2O,两个压力通道的再现性分别为2.32±2.97和3.67±5.31%。此外,我们的设备的临床评估表明,该系统具有准确监测有助于患者诊断和管理的信息类型的能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号