【24h】

Liquid Explosives – The Threat to Civil Aviation and the European Response

机译:液体爆炸物 - 对民航和欧洲反应的威胁

获取原文

摘要

This paper deals with the specific group of homemade liquid high explosives in relation to aviation security. The sudden and irrefutable focus on homemade explosives and liquid explosives in particular after the 2006 defeated attacks in London, made the aviation security community realize that the security system and equipment were not optimized for this particular kind of substances. It is now generally accepted that hydrogen peroxide based liquid explosives (HPOM) pose a terrorist threat to civil aviation. It is easy, cheap and relatively safe to make effective HPOM IEDs. It is a high explosive of increasing and serious interest to terrorists and has been used recently.In comparison to the well-know ‘old fashioned’ military and commercial explosives, liquid explosives and in particular HPOM are more difficult to detect because they are less well-defined by their chemical properties (poorly controlled manufacturing), they contain no nitrogen and their physical appearance (like shape, color) is poorly defined an hardly unique, in part because they need a container like a bottle or can or plastic bag etc. Both Europe and USA introduced late 2006 the so-called liquids-regulations at checkpoints to counter this threat, but this may become harder to sustain in the future.Several countries contribute to the search for and development of existing and new technological solutions with the aim to relieve the measures and increase the effectiveness of the overall security process. The final solution would be to be able to detect liquid explosives inside a carry-on bag at operational speed. This is not yet possible with current technology. A second best option for the time being would be to be able to detect liquid explosives inside the 11 plastic bag.Even now existing technologies (like X-ray transmission, trace and chemical) can help in detection, sometimes after tuning to the specific problem. Inspection of single bottles or the 11 plastic bag offers the best options today, but detection inside the carry-on bag in operation (speed requirements, false alarm behavior) offers prospects too. Further development in combination with ongoing research into the characteristics of homemade explosives, specifically liquid explosives, will probably make the balance shift towards technological solutions in the near future.
机译:本文涉及与航空安全有关的特定液体高爆炸物组。特别是在伦敦击败2006年击败2006年的自制炸药和液体爆炸物上的突然和无可辩驳的重点,使航空安全界意识到安全系统和设备未针对这种特殊的物质进行优化。现在普遍认为,基于过氧化氢的液体炸药(HPOM)对民用航空构成了恐怖主义威胁。有效的HPOM IED很容易,便宜且相对安全。这是一个很高的爆炸性对恐怖主义者的增加和严重兴趣,最近已经使用。与知名的“老式”军事和商业爆炸物相比,液体炸药和特别是HPOM更难以检测,因为它们不太好 - 通过其化学性质(控制制造不良),它们不含氮气和它们的物理外观(如形状,颜色)难以定义一个难以独特的,部分原因是它们需要像瓶子或罐子或塑料袋等的容器。欧洲和美国介绍了2006年底所谓的液体法规在检查站来反驳这种威胁,但这可能更加努力实现未来。各国有助于寻求和开发现有和新技术解决方案的目标减轻措施并提高整体安全进程的有效性。最终解决方案是能够以操作速度在随身携带袋内检测液体炸药。目前的技术尚不可能。暂时的第二个最佳选择是能够能够检测到11个塑料袋内的液体炸药。即使现有技术(如X射线传输,痕迹和化学)可以有助于检测,有时在调整特定问题之后。单瓶或11个塑料袋的检查提供了最佳选择,但在运行中的随身携带袋中检测(速度要求,假警报行为)也提供了潜在客户。进一步发展与正在进行的研究进入自制炸药的特点,特别是液体爆炸物,可能会在不久的将来朝着技术解决方案转变。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号