首页> 外文会议>GeoCongress >Reliability Analysis of Bearing Capacity Equations for Drilled Shafts Socketed in Weathered Rock
【24h】

Reliability Analysis of Bearing Capacity Equations for Drilled Shafts Socketed in Weathered Rock

机译:风化岩石钻井轴承能力方程的可靠性分析

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

As the use of drilled shafts for the foundation of a large size structure increases, the evaluation of the reliable bearing capacity of a pile has become important. The purpose of this study is to examine the reliability of bearing capacity equations for drilled shafts socketed in weathered rock by comparing the bearing capacity values obtained by the bearing capacity equations with the measured ones. To this aim, 17 static load test data obtained from four field sites were collected, and based on these test data, the ultimate bearing capacity of rock-socketed piles were acquired. Three bearing capacity equations widely used in practice were selected for the reliability analysis. They are the AASHTO method (1996), Carter & Kulhawy method (1988), and FHWA method (1999). The comparison of the bearing capacity values showed that FHWA method predicted the bearing capacities most closely to the measured ones on average, whereas the Carter & Kulhawy method (1988) and AASHTO method (1996) consistently predicted bearing capacities conservatively with acceptable discrepancy.
机译:由于使用钻井轴的大尺寸结构的基础,因此对桩的可靠承载力的评估变得重要。本研究的目的是通过比较由轴承能量方程与测量的轴承容量方程获得的承载能力值来检查钻孔轴的承载力方程的可靠性。为此目的,收集了从四个场地获得的17个静态负载测试数据,并基于这些测试数据,获得了岩石插座桩的最终承载能力。选择三种承载能量方程广泛用于实践中的可靠性分析。它们是AASHTO方法(1996),Carter&Kulhawy方法(1988)和FHWA方法(1999)。承载能力值的比较表明,FHWA方法平均预测轴承容量,而卡特&Kulhawy方法(1988)和AASHTO方法(1996)始终如一地预测承载能力,可守保地具有可接受的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号