首页> 外文会议>Institution of Engieering and Technology Seminar on Appropriate Healthcare Technologies for Developing Countries >INCIDENCE OF COMPLETE HEART BLOCK AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF PACEMAKER THERAPY IN INDIA
【24h】

INCIDENCE OF COMPLETE HEART BLOCK AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF PACEMAKER THERAPY IN INDIA

机译:印度起搏器治疗的完全心障和成本效益的发病率

获取原文

摘要

Complete Heart Block (CHB) is a cardiac disease associated with extremely low heart rates and if untreated, results in average longevity of only 2.5 years. Extrapolating the demographics of CHB in the United States to the global population, we estimated the global annual incidence of the disease in 2005 to be 430,000. European baseline data resulted in similar estimates. More than 80% of these patients live in developing countries and most do not receive treatment. In India and China alone, there were 140,000 new cases (50,000 in India) and less than 20% in each country received treatment. The only effective treatment for CHB is implantation of a cardiac pacemaker. The key reasons for low pacemaker implant rates are lack of reimbursement, poor awareness and inadequate diagnosis of CHB. An economic model was developed to evaluate incremental cost-effectiveness of pacing vs no-pacing for CHB and analyzed for India. This economic model can be used to compute cost-effectiveness for any geography. The survival data from Barlow et al (2000), which reviewed the results from 9 studies in 704 patients, was used for the model. The average total mortality in CHB patient without pacemakers was 50% at 2.5 years and 68% at 5 years. Assuming Rs.72,000 ($1750) cost for a single-chamber pacemaker and it's implant in India, 7 year device longevity and mean age of 55 years at implant, the cost effectiveness of pacing therapy was Rs.32,000 ($773)/life year saved. Sensitivity analysis for various ages at implant did not significantly alter cost-effectiveness. This cost-effectiveness figure is well within the WHO recommendation of a cost-effective therapy as one less than 3*GNI/capita (Rs.89, 000 or $2160/life year saved). Changes in reimbursement policy for treatment of CHB, leading to greater adoption of pacing, can significantly reduce the disease burden attributable to this lethal cardiac disease.
机译:完整的心脏嵌段(CHB)是一种与极低心脏速率相关的心脏病,如果未经治疗,则导致平均寿命仅为2.5岁。将CHB的人口统计学推断到全球人口,我们估计2005年全球疾病的年龄发生率为430,000。欧洲基线数据导致类似的估计。超过80%的患者住在发展中国家,大多数人没有接受治疗。仅在印度和中国,每个国家都有140,000名新案例(印度50,000件),每一国收到治疗。 CHB的唯一有效治疗是植入心脏起搏器。低起搏器植入物率的主要原因缺乏报销,意识差和对CHB的诊断不足。开发了经济模式,以评估节奏的增量成本效益,对CHB进行CHB,并为印度分析。这种经济模式可用于计算任何地理的成本效益。来自Barlow等人(2000)的生存数据,这些数据在704名患者中审查了9项研究的结果,用于该模型。没有起搏器的CHB患者的平均总死亡率为50%,5年为68%。假设单人空皮书的成本为72,000(1750美元),它在印度植入,7年的设备寿命和植入55年的平均年龄,节奏治疗的成本效益为32,000卢比(773美元)/救生年度。植入物中各种年龄的敏感性分析并没有显着改变成本效益。这种成本效益的人物在世卫组织内部建议将具有成本效益的治疗的建议,如少于3 * GNI / CAPITA(保存了89,000或2160美元/终身年份)。治疗CHB的报销政策的变化,导致更加采用起搏,可以显着降低致命性心脏病归因于致病性疾病的疾病负担。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号