首页> 外文会议>GEO-DENVER >INFLUENCE OF THE 2002 TEXAS SECTION OF ASCE RECOMMENDED PRACTICE ON THE BEAM DEPTHS FOR STIFFENED SLABS ON SHRINK-SWELL SOILS USING BRAB AND WRI
【24h】

INFLUENCE OF THE 2002 TEXAS SECTION OF ASCE RECOMMENDED PRACTICE ON THE BEAM DEPTHS FOR STIFFENED SLABS ON SHRINK-SWELL SOILS USING BRAB AND WRI

机译:2002年德克萨斯州ASCE施工段对梁深度施工梁深度的影响,使用BRAB和WRI对收缩膨胀土壤的加强板

获取原文

摘要

The most common foundation for light structures founded on shrink-swell soils is the stiffened slab on grade. The beam depth is an intrinsic design parameter for this type of foundation, it usually ranges between 0.6 and 1.2 m with common beam spacing of 3 to 6 m in both directions. The following methods are among the most common methods used to calculate the beam depth, spacing, and reinforcement needed for a safe and serviceable foundation: 1) BRAB Method (1968); 2) WRI Method (1980, 1996); 3) PTI Method (1996); 4) AS 2870 (1996); 5) PTI Method (2004). In 2002, the Texas section of ASCE provided recommended practice for the design of residential foundations that impacts the beam depth using WRI and BRAB. To examine the influence of this recommended practice in the resulting beam depths, 27 cases are designed. They include three simple rectangular stiffened slabs subjected to three different weather patterns, built on three different shrink-swell soils, and loaded with a uniform pressure and perimeter line load. The resulting beam depths using the WRI and BRAB methods with and without the recommendations of the Texas section of ASCE are presented and discussed for different soil and weather conditions. The PTI and Australian method are also presented for additional comparison purposes.
机译:在收缩膨胀土壤上建立的光结构最常见的基础是级别的加强板坯。光束深度是这种基础的内在设计参数,它通常在0.6和1.2μm之间,两个方向的共同束间距为3至6μm。以下方法是用于计算安全可维修基础所需的光束深度,间距和增强的最常用方法中:1)BRAB方法(1968); 2)WRI方法(1980,1996); 3)PTI方法(1996); 4)为2870(1996); 5)PTI方法(2004)。 2002年,Asce的德克萨斯州段提供了建议的居住基础,使用WRI和BRAB对梁深度影响光束深度的设计。为了检查这一推荐的实践在所产生的光束深度中的影响,设计了27例。它们包括三个简单的矩形加强板,经过三种不同的天气模式,内置于三个不同的收缩膨胀土壤,并装有均匀的压力和周边线负荷。展示并讨论了使用WRI和BRAB方法的由WRI和BRAB方法进行了不同的土壤和天气条件。还介绍了PTI和澳大利亚方法以获取其他比较目的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号