【24h】

Helmet protection: Why not more?

机译:盔甲保护:为什么不更多?

获取原文

摘要

Every day, people of good intention sell Americans safety helmets tested to antiquated performance standards that have failed to take advantage of test methodology and scientific advances available for the past decade. It's important to understand how and why helmet protection has failed to be "all it can be." Let this analysis serve as a lesson to those responsible for the creation of safety standards and the design and sale of helmets. This paper is written to motivate, not criticize. Virtually every helmet sold in this country, whether it is a bicycle helmet, a football helmet or a motorcycle helmet, is designed to meet a test standard established by either a government agency or a private industry-based organization. These standards have all been derived from very primitive biomechanical work and allegorical information dating back to the 1950s and 1960s. From Darrel Stingly to Dale Earnhardt, countless injuries and death may be a by-product of myopic standardization. Let's see why.
机译:每天,良好意图的人都会出售美国人安全头盔测试,以便在过去十年中未能利用测试方法和科学进展的过时的性能标准。了解如何以及为什么头盔保护未能成为“所有它可以。”很重要。让这种分析作为负责创建安全标准和头盔设计和销售的人员的教训。本文是为了激励,而不是批评。几乎在这个国家销售的每一个头盔,无论是自行车头盔,足球头盔还是摩托车头盔,都旨在满足由政府机构或私营行业的组织建立的测试标准。这些标准都得到了非常原始的生物力学工作和寓言信息,可追溯到20世纪50年代和20世纪60年代。从达雷达到戴尔·伊斯塔尔特,无数伤害和死亡可能是近视标准化的副产品。让我们看看为什么。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号