首页> 外文会议>WaterJet Technology Association American waterjet conference >ANALYTICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF FLASH RUST FORMED ON CARBON STEEL AFTER UHP WATERJETTING
【24h】

ANALYTICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF FLASH RUST FORMED ON CARBON STEEL AFTER UHP WATERJETTING

机译:UHP水再生后碳钢上形成的闪蒸锈的分析特征

获取原文

摘要

It is well established that when steel components are cleaned by high-pressure (HP) or ultra high pressure (UHP) waterjetting the surface begins to oxidize or ?flash rust? within a short period of time. Rusting per se is also observed after mechanical cleaning (abrasive blasting) of steel surfaces. However, it has been postulated that the rusting observed with the two cleaning methods are ?different? in nature. The present paper provides results of an in-depth investigation dealing with the composition, the thickness and other characteristics of the flash rust formed on steel surfaces after UHP waterjetting. Three levels of flash rusting; no flash rust (NFR), light flash rust (LFR), and moderate flash rust (MFR) were examined, using different surface analytical techniques. These included: (a) SEM examination to characterize the morphology of the oxide, (b) EDS analysis to determine elemental composition of the specimen surface, (c) XPS (or ESCA) analysis to obtain quantitative information about the composition and depth profile of the oxide layer, and (d) Raman Spectroscopy for characterizing the type of oxide. For comparison, an atmospherically corroded steel sample was also analyzed using the same techniques. Based on XPS and Raman Spectroscopy data the composition of the oxide film on flash rusted samples is a complex mixture of different forms of stoichiometric and non-stoichiometric oxides of iron but mainly FeO, Fe2O3, Fe3O4, hydrated Fe3O4 and FeOOH. Based on the depth profile data, the approximate average oxide thickness was found to be 473 nm (0.5 μm) for the NFR specimen, 2398 nm (2.4 μm) for the LFR specimen, and 18209 nm (18.2 μm) for the MFR specimen. The oxide on the atmospherically corroded sample is of a similar composition but with different distribution and proportion.
机译:这是公认的是,当钢部件由高压(HP)或超高压(UHP)水射流表面清洗开始氧化或?闪锈?很短的时间期间内。在钢表面的机械清洁(磨料爆破)之后也观察到生锈本身。然而,据推测,在两国的清洁方法观察生锈了?有什么不同?在自然界。本文提供了在UHP水肠道后钢表面上形成的闪蒸生锈的组合物,厚度和其他特性的深入调查的结果。三级闪蒸生锈;使用不同的表面分析技术检查没有闪存生锈(NFR),灯闪锈(LFR)和中等闪存生锈(MFR)。这些包括:(a)SEM检查表征氧化物的形态,(b)EDS分析以确定样品表面的元素组成,(c)XPS(或ESCA)分析,以获得有关组合物和深度剖面的定量信息氧化物层和(d)拉曼光谱,用于表征氧化物的类型。为了比较,还使用相同的技术分析大气腐蚀的钢样品。根据XPS和拉曼光谱数据的氧化膜的上闪锈样品组合物的不同形式的铁的化学计量和非化学计量氧化物的但主要的FeO,Fe2O3的,四氧化三铁,四氧化三铁的水合和的FeOOH的复杂混合物。基于所述深度轮廓数据,近似平均氧化物厚度被发现是用于NFR标本473纳米(0.5微米),对于LFR样品2398纳米(2.4微米),以及用于MFR标本18209纳米(18.2微米)。大气腐蚀样品上的氧化物是相似的组成,但具有不同的分布和比例。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号