首页> 外文会议>Conference on Image and Signal Processing for Remote Sensing >Spatial resolution enhancement of EO-1 ALI bands
【24h】

Spatial resolution enhancement of EO-1 ALI bands

机译:EO-1 ALI带的空间分辨率提高

获取原文

摘要

In the mid-1980s, image fusion received significant attention from researchers in remote sensing and image processing, as SPOT 1 (launched in 1986) provided high-resolution (10m) Pan images and low-resolution (20m) MS images. Since that time, much research has been done to develop effective image fusion techniques. Image fusion is a technique used to integrate the geometric detail of a high-resolution panchromatic (Pan) image and the color information of a lowresolution multispectral (MS) image to produce a high-resolution MS image. Many methods such as Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Multiplicative Transform, Brovey Transform, and IHS Transform have been developed in the last few years producing good quality fused images. These images are usually characterized by high information content, but with significantly altered spectral information content. There are also some limitations in these fusion techniques. The most significant problem is color distortion. A major reason for the significant color distortion in fusion provoked by many fusion techniques is the wavelength extension of some satellite panchromatic images. Unlike the panchromatic image of the SPOT and IRS sensors, the wavelength range of the new satellites is extended from the visible into the near infrared. This difference significantly changes the gray values of the new panchromatic images. Therefore, traditional image fusion techniques - useful for fusing SPOT Pan with other MS images - cannot achieve quality fusion results for the new satellite images. More recently new techniques have been proposed such as the Wavelet Transform, the Pansharp Transform and the Modified IHS Transform. Those techniques seem to reduce the color distortion problem and to keep the statistical parameters invariable. Ideally, the methods used to fuse image data sets should preserve the spectral characteristics of the original multispectral input image. While many technologies exist and emphasize the preservation of spectral characteristics, they do not take into account the resolution ratio of the input images. Usually the spatial resolution of the panchromatic image is two (Landsat 7, Spot 1-4) or four times (Ikonos, Quickbird) better than the size of the multispectral images. This paper is an attempt to fuse high-resolution panchromatic and low-resolution multispectral bands of the EO-1 ALI sensor. ALI collects nine multispectral bands with 30m resolution and a panchromatic band with 3 times better resolution (10m). ALI has a panchromatic band narrower than the respective band of Landsat7. It has also two narrower bands in the spectral range of Landsat7 band 4. It has also an extra narrower band near the spectral range of Landsat7 band 1. In this study we compare the efficiency of seven fusion techniques and more especially the efficiency of Gram Schmidt, Modified IHS, PCA, Pansharp, Wavelet and LMM (Local Mean Matching) LMVM (Local Mean and Variance Matching) fusion techniques for the fusion of ALI data. Two ALI images collected over the same area have been used. In order to quantitatively measure the quality of the fused images we have made the following controls: Firstly, we have examined the optical qualitative result. Then, we examined the correlation between the original multispectral and the fused images and all the statistical parameters of the histograms of the various frequency bands. All the fusion techniques improve the resolution and the optical result. In contrary to the fusion of other data (ETM, Spot5, Ikonos and Quickbird) all the algorithms provoke small changes to the statistical parameters.
机译:在20世纪80年代中期,图像融合从遥感和图像处理中的研究人员接受了重大关注,如点1(于1986年推出)提供了高分辨率(10M)PAN图像和低分辨率(20M)MS图像。从那时起,已经完成了许多研究来开发有效的图像融合技术。图像融合是一种技术,用于集成高分辨率平板(PAN)图像的几何细节和Lowresolution MultiSpectral(MS)图像的颜色信息以产生高分辨率MS图像。许多方法如主成分分析(PCA),乘法转换,Brovey变换和IHS变换已经在后几年中开发了生产良好的融合图像。这些图像通常具有高信息内容的特征,但是具有显着改变的光谱信息内容。这些融合技术也有一些限制。最重要的问题是颜色失真。许多融合技术引发的融合中显着颜色变形的主要原因是一些卫星平面图像的波长延伸。与点和IRS传感器的全色图像不同,新卫星的波长范围从可见的近红外线延伸。这种差异显着改变了新的全色图像的灰度值。因此,传统的图像融合技术 - 用于使用其他MS图像融合点PAN - 无法为新卫星图像实现优质融合结果。最近已经提出了更新的新技术,例如小波变换,Pansharp变换和修改的IHS变换。这些技术似乎减少了颜色失真问题,并保持统计参数不变。理想地,用于熔断图像数据集的方法应保留原始多光谱输入图像的光谱特性。虽然存在许多技术并强调保护频谱特性,但它们不考虑输入图像的分辨率。通常,Panchromic图像的空间分辨率是两个(Landsat 7,Spot 1-4)或四次(Ikonos,Quickbird)的尺寸优于多光谱图像的大小。本文试图保险熔断EO-1 ALI传感器的高分辨率平面和低分辨率多光谱带。 ALI收集九个多光谱带,具有30米分辨率和一个具有3倍的分辨率(10m)的平面频带。 Ali具有比Landsat7相应乐队更窄的全组织频段。它还在Landsat7频段的频谱范围内有两个较窄的带。它还在Landsat7带的频谱范围附近具有额外的较窄带。在该研究中,我们比较七种融合技术的效率,更尤其是Gram Schmidt的效率,修改的IHS,PCA,PANSHARP,小波和LMM(局部均值匹配)LMVM(局部均值和方差匹配)融合ALI数据的融合技术。已经使用了在同一区域上收集的两个ALI图像。为了定量测量我们所做的融合图像的质量,我们进行了以下控制:首先,我们已经检查了光学定性结果。然后,我们检查了原始多光谱和融合图像之间的相关性以及各个频带的直方图的所有统计参数。所有融合技术都改善了分辨率和光学结果。违反其他数据的融合(ETM,Spot5,Ikonos和Quickbird)所有算法都会引起统计参数的少量变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号